[PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz

[PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

Spanish law was based on CEPT/EU rules:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000058.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000059.html


Orden ITC/332/2010, de 12 de febrero, por la que se aprueba el cuadro
nacional de atribución de frecuencias (CNAF):
https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2010-2719
https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/02/19/pdfs/BOE-A-2010-2719.pdf

search for:
 UN - 85 RLANs y datos en 2400 a 2483,5 MHz (pag. 213)
 UN – 128 RLANs en 5 GHz (pag. 232)

more info at "Cuadro nacional de atribución de frecuencias (CNAF)":
http://www.minetur.gob.es/telecomunicaciones/espectro/paginas/cnaf.aspx

Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>

---
 db.txt |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
index 4c54543..11409d6 100644
--- a/db.txt
+++ b/db.txt
@@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ country EG:
 	(5250 - 5330 @ 20), (N/A, 20), DFS
 
 country ES: DFS-ETSI
-	(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
-	(5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
-	(5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS
-	(5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS
+	(2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW)
+	(5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
+	(5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
+	(5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS
 
 country FI: DFS-ETSI
 	(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
-- 
1.7.10.4

Re: [PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
<xose.vazquez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Spanish law was based on CEPT/EU rules:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000058.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000059.html
>
>
> Orden ITC/332/2010, de 12 de febrero, por la que se aprueba el cuadro
> nacional de atribución de frecuencias (CNAF):
> https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2010-2719
> https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/02/19/pdfs/BOE-A-2010-2719.pdf
>
> search for:
>  UN - 85 RLANs y datos en 2400 a 2483,5 MHz (pag. 213)
>  UN – 128 RLANs en 5 GHz (pag. 232)
>
> more info at "Cuadro nacional de atribución de frecuencias (CNAF)":
> http://www.minetur.gob.es/telecomunicaciones/espectro/paginas/cnaf.aspx
>
> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>  db.txt |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> index 4c54543..11409d6 100644
> --- a/db.txt
> +++ b/db.txt
> @@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ country EG:
>         (5250 - 5330 @ 20), (N/A, 20), DFS
>
>  country ES: DFS-ETSI
> -       (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
> -       (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
> -       (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS
> -       (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS
> +       (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW)
> +       (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
> +       (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
> +       (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS

You are changing from dBm to mW directly... please do the unit change
in one patch and *then* the actual change. This would make it easier
to review....

  Luis

Re: [PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 07/04/2012 02:49 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
> <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> wrote:

>>   country ES: DFS-ETSI
>> -       (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
>> -       (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
>> -       (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS
>> -       (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS
>> +       (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW)
>> +       (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
>> +       (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
>> +       (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS

> You are changing from dBm to mW directly... please do the unit change
> in one patch and *then* the actual change. This would make it easier
> to review....

I did copy & paste from DE to ES. These are basic CEPT rules.

10 log(100) = 20
10 log(500) ~ 27

Anyway tomorrow, I will send a new patch.

Re: [PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz

[Arend van Spriel]

On 07/04/2012 03:05 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 02:49 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
>> <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>   country ES: DFS-ETSI
>>> -       (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
>>> -       (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
>>> -       (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS
>>> -       (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS
>>> +       (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW)
>>> +       (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
>>> +       (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
>>> +       (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS
> 
>> You are changing from dBm to mW directly... please do the unit change
>> in one patch and *then* the actual change. This would make it easier
>> to review....
> 
> I did copy & paste from DE to ES. These are basic CEPT rules.
> 
> 10 log(100) = 20
> 10 log(500) ~ 27
> 
> Anyway tomorrow, I will send a new patch.

Just a general remark not specific to this patch. The commit message
often contains a source reference. I think it would be useful to have
this reference in the database a well so people validating it do not
need to do the digging using 'git blame'. Does that make sense?

Gr. AvS

Re: [PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz

[Kalle Valo]

"Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com> writes:

> Just a general remark not specific to this patch. The commit message
> often contains a source reference. I think it would be useful to have
> this reference in the database a well so people validating it do not
> need to do the digging using 'git blame'. Does that make sense?

Yes :)

IMHO makes a lot easier to validate the entries.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: [PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz

[Arend van Spriel]

On 07/09/2012 03:14 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com> writes:
> 
>> Just a general remark not specific to this patch. The commit message
>> often contains a source reference. I think it would be useful to have
>> this reference in the database as well so people validating it do not
>> need to do the digging using 'git blame'. Does that make sense?
> 
> Yes :)
> 
> IMHO makes a lot easier to validate the entries.
> 

Luis, John,

What are your thoughts on my remark above?

Gr. AvS

Re: [PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz

[John W. Linville]

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 04:01:13PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 03:14 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com> writes:
> > 
> >> Just a general remark not specific to this patch. The commit message
> >> often contains a source reference. I think it would be useful to have
> >> this reference in the database as well so people validating it do not
> >> need to do the digging using 'git blame'. Does that make sense?
> > 
> > Yes :)
> > 
> > IMHO makes a lot easier to validate the entries.
> > 
> 
> Luis, John,
> 
> What are your thoughts on my remark above?

It seems reasonable to me.  OTOH, it could lead to a lot of clutter
in the database file...?  I guess it is a matter of judgment.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.