From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from hub022-nj-2.exch022.serverdata.net ([206.225.164.185]:11530 "EHLO HUB022-nj-2.exch022.serverdata.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756542Ab2I0HV3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:21:29 -0400 Message-ID: <5063FE74.2050003@posedge.com> (sfid-20120927_092138_007543_909264A8) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:51:24 +0530 From: Mahesh Palivela MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: VHT peer STA caps References: <952C5D5D0470AE4FB7D8A75C6ADC71CA0FCF5269@mbx022-e1-nj-10.exch022.domain.local> <1348477154.10257.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50614089.6020105@posedge.com> <1348557902.10041.17.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50617E2C.6050000@posedge.com> <1348582152.10041.36.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5062736B.9060008@posedge.com> <1348660422.10548.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <506339C3.40405@posedge.com> <1348682036.10548.13.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5063C6B1.8030301@posedge.com> <1348727075.10353.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5063F372.2040601@posedge.com> <1348729265.10353.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1348729265.10353.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/27/2012 12:31 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > I think it's fine if you leave the code as is, but change the comment to > make the HT/VHT difference clear. Ok. So we will go with patch v2 with document section clearly mentioning "vht_cap of remote STA taking as is" Thanks, Mahesh