From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Questions on direct-cabling 3x3 MIMO systems (ath9k)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:06:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506E0859.906@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506DDA1D.1090106@candelatech.com>
On 10/04/2012 11:49 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> I finally got my 3-attenuator system up and running,
> and I'm starting to do some tests.
>
> AP and Station are running 3.5.5+, ath9k ar9380 NICs.
> Channel 157, HT40, no encryption.
>
> One question right away: Should I expect decent performance
> if I directly cable 2 wifi NICs, where one is acting as AP and
> the other as station? I'm cabling ch0 to ch0, ch1 to ch1, ch2 to ch2.
Well, to try to answer my own question:
I mainly needed to tune socket tx/rx-buffer sizes, and some similar
things to get the performance up to expected rates, so it was
mostly user error.
Now, I'm still seeing lots of strange issues when running through
the attenuator with lots of attenuation, but at least when things
are configured for low amounts of attenuation, I get good performance
(330+Mbps UDP throughput).
Off to look at excessive crc errors...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-04 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 18:49 Questions on direct-cabling 3x3 MIMO systems (ath9k) Ben Greear
2012-10-04 22:06 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-10-04 22:36 ` Julian Calaby
2012-10-04 22:41 ` Ben Greear
2012-10-04 22:53 ` Julian Calaby
2012-10-04 23:01 ` Ben Greear
2012-10-04 23:48 ` Julian Calaby
2012-10-05 17:44 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506E0859.906@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).