From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] multi-channel/interface TX power handling
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:39:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508827E6.3000703@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351099817.10709.6.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On 10/24/2012 10:30 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 09:31 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>>> Yeah that'd be the only way, most scripts I've seen always just use the
>>> interface anyway though? I'm not totally happy about this, maybe we
>>> should iterate all interfaces? Not really sure ...
>>
>> Well, I think we should make setting the wiphy work...just iterate
>> all interfaces. Breaking backwards compatibility just causes too
>> much problems for user-space, and many users may either not notice,
>> or not be able to change whatever software is screwing up.
>
> Yeah I guess.
>
>> But, I think we also need some way to know if we can set individual
>> vifs to different tx-power successfully.
>>
>> Maybe a /sys/class/netdev/wlan0/tx-power file to read current power could
>> be added in this patch series? Then user-space could key off of it's
>> existence, and it would give a simple way to read the current tx-power
>> settings (and possibly set it as well)...
>
> sysfs file sounds like about the worst possible way (except maybe for
> procfs), an nl80211 feature flag could be worthwhile though :)
Ok, a feature flag sounds fine to me.
Thanks,
Ben
>
> johannes
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-24 10:13 [PATCH 0/4] multi-channel/interface TX power handling Johannes Berg
2012-10-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] nl80211: move "can set channel" check Johannes Berg
2012-10-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] cfg80211: make TX power setting per interface Johannes Berg
2012-10-24 16:27 ` Ben Greear
2012-10-24 17:31 ` Johannes Berg
2012-10-24 17:38 ` Ben Greear
2012-10-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] mac80211: handle TX power per virtual interface Johannes Berg
2012-10-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] mac80211_hwsim: print per interface TX power Johannes Berg
2012-10-24 15:40 ` [PATCH 0/4] multi-channel/interface TX power handling Ben Greear
2012-10-24 15:42 ` Johannes Berg
2012-10-24 16:31 ` Ben Greear
2012-10-24 17:30 ` Johannes Berg
2012-10-24 17:39 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-10-24 23:05 ` Is Multi-Vif (vaps) Different Channel Operation Supported? Kelly Hogan
2012-10-24 23:56 ` Ben Greear
2012-10-27 8:19 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-10-27 18:19 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-10-28 22:06 ` Adrian Chadd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508827E6.3000703@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).