From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:60433 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933646Ab2JaV3e (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:29:34 -0400 Message-ID: <50919830.4000800@candelatech.com> (sfid-20121031_222947_700349_658AEF28) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:29:20 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Problem with drv_remove_interface when associated in 3.5.7? References: <50917587.9010305@candelatech.com> (sfid-20121031_200131_307985_1A302D25) <1351710420.6281.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1351710420.6281.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/31/2012 12:07 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 12:01 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: >> I am working on debugging the splat I reported a few days ago in a tainted >> 3.5.7 kernel. I've removed the tainting module, and added some debug. >> >> I think at least part of the problem is that drv_remove_interface can >> be called with ifmgd->associated != NULL. > > That should be fixed by this patch, I hope: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211.git;a=commit;h=6863255bd0e48bc41ae5a066d5c771801e92735a > > johannes > Yes, that seems to have done the trick. Thanks! Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com