Re: [PATCH v3.7] brcmsmac: handle packet drop on enqueuing correctly

["Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>]

On 11/26/2012 08:20 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:55:11AM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:44:42PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> From: Piotr Haber <phaber@broadcom.com>
>>>
>>> In the event that tx packet can not be queued by the driver
>>> the packet is dropped. Propagate that information to the .tx()
>>> callback to make sure the freed packet is not accessed after
>>> that.
>>>
>>> This has happened causing slab corruptions as reported by
>>> Stanislaw Gruszka.
>>>
>>> Bug #47721: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
>>> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Piotr Haber <phaber@broadcom.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> Fixing a kernel bug so based on the wireless repository. The
>>> fix for wireless-next will be posted separately as the patches
>>> differ. So this patch does not need to be merged to the
>>> wireless-next tree.
>>
>> Let me know if I can be of help in resolving the conflicts. Fwiw the fix
>> looks like it ought to be easy to make on top of wireless-next, but I do
>> have a couple of comments.
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>>> index be5bcfb..a6605b1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>>> @@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>>>  	struct ieee80211_hdr *h;
>>>  	u16 seq, start_seq = 0, bindex, index, mcl;
>>>  	u8 mcs = 0;
>>> -	bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false;
>>> +	bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false, last_packet = false;
>>>  	u8 suc_mpdu = 0, tot_mpdu = 0;
>>>  	uint supr_status;
>>>  	bool update_rate = true, retry = true, tx_error = false;
>>> @@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>>>  
>>>  		index = TX_SEQ_TO_INDEX(seq);
>>>  		ack_recd = false;
>>> +		last_packet = (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
>>> +			TXC_AMPDU_LAST);
>>>  		if (ba_recd) {
>>>  			bindex = MODSUB_POW2(seq, start_seq, SEQNUM_MAX);
>>>  			BCMMSG(wiphy,
>>> @@ -1074,8 +1076,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>>>  		tot_mpdu++;
>>>  
>>>  		/* break out if last packet of ampdu */
>>> -		if (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
>>> -		    TXC_AMPDU_LAST)
>>> +		if (last_packet)
>>>  			break;
>>>  
>>>  		p = dma_getnexttxp(wlc->hw->di[queue], DMA_RANGE_TRANSMITTED);
>>
>> These changes are effectively a no-op and don't really seem to have
>> anything to do with fixing the bug.
> 
> I concur -- could you remove these bits for the 3.7 fix?
> 

True. Will resend it.

Gr. AvS