linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] mac80211: re-organize the rx rate calculation logic
@ 2012-11-26 12:17 saravanad
  2012-11-26 15:08 ` Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: saravanad @ 2012-11-26 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: johannes; +Cc: linux-wireless

Mac80211: currently the logic to calculate the rx rate is accessible 
only in the cfg.c as the rate_idx_to_bitrate() is static function.
The rx rate calculation might be needed by other files(modules) of 
mac80211(possibly debugfs). So grouping the rx rate calculation logic to
a separate function which can be accessed from other files. This change 
will make the rx rate calculation implementation similar to tx rate.

Signed-off-by: Saravana <saravanad@posedge.com>
---
The diff file is generated from wireless-testing git tree.
  net/mac80211/cfg.c      |   21 +++++++++++++--------
  net/mac80211/sta_info.h |    2 ++
  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
index 6733b374..0999547 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
@@ -396,6 +396,18 @@ void sta_set_rate_info_tx(struct sta_info *sta,
  	rate_idx_to_bitrate(rinfo, sta, rate->idx);
  }

+void sta_set_rate_info_rx(struct sta_info *sta, struct rate_info 
*rinfo)
+{
+	rinfo->flags = 0;
+	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_HT)
+		rinfo->flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_MCS;
+	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_40MHZ)
+		rinfo->flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_40_MHZ_WIDTH;
+	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_SHORT_GI)
+		rinfo->flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
+	rate_idx_to_bitrate(rinfo, sta, sta->last_rx_rate_idx);
+
+}
  static void sta_set_sinfo(struct sta_info *sta, struct station_info 
*sinfo)
  {
  	struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = sta->sdata;
@@ -443,14 +455,7 @@ static void sta_set_sinfo(struct sta_info *sta, 
struct station_info *sinfo)

  	sta_set_rate_info_tx(sta, &sta->last_tx_rate, &sinfo->txrate);

-	sinfo->rxrate.flags = 0;
-	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_HT)
-		sinfo->rxrate.flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_MCS;
-	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_40MHZ)
-		sinfo->rxrate.flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_40_MHZ_WIDTH;
-	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_SHORT_GI)
-		sinfo->rxrate.flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
-	rate_idx_to_bitrate(&sinfo->rxrate, sta, sta->last_rx_rate_idx);
+	sta_set_rate_info_rx(sta, &sinfo->rxrate);

  	if (ieee80211_vif_is_mesh(&sdata->vif)) {
  #ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH
diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.h b/net/mac80211/sta_info.h
index 776f3d0..122d853 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.h
+++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.h
@@ -550,6 +550,8 @@ int sta_info_flush(struct ieee80211_local *local,
  void sta_set_rate_info_tx(struct sta_info *sta,
  			  const struct ieee80211_tx_rate *rate,
  			  struct rate_info *rinfo);
+void sta_set_rate_info_rx(struct sta_info *sta,
+			struct rate_info *rinfo);
  void ieee80211_sta_expire(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
  			  unsigned long exp_time);


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] mac80211: re-organize the rx rate calculation logic
  2012-11-26 12:17 [RFC] mac80211: re-organize the rx rate calculation logic saravanad
@ 2012-11-26 15:08 ` Johannes Berg
  2012-11-27  6:20   ` Saravana
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2012-11-26 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: saravanad; +Cc: linux-wireless

On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 04:17 -0800, saravanad@posedge.com wrote:
> Mac80211: currently the logic to calculate the rx rate is accessible 
> only in the cfg.c as the rate_idx_to_bitrate() is static function.
> The rx rate calculation might be needed by other files(modules) of 
> mac80211(possibly debugfs). So grouping the rx rate calculation logic to
> a separate function which can be accessed from other files. This change 
> will make the rx rate calculation implementation similar to tx rate.

Generally, this seems fine. Your patches are line-wrapped though.

> Signed-off-by: Saravana <saravanad@posedge.com>
> ---
> The diff file is generated from wireless-testing git tree.

I just changed this code in mac80211-next and would appreciate if you
would rebase onto that.

> +void sta_set_rate_info_rx(struct sta_info *sta, struct rate_info 
> *rinfo)
> +{
> +	rinfo->flags = 0;
> +	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_HT)
> +		rinfo->flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_MCS;
> +	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_40MHZ)
> +		rinfo->flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_40_MHZ_WIDTH;
> +	if (sta->last_rx_rate_flag & RX_FLAG_SHORT_GI)
> +		rinfo->flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
> +	rate_idx_to_bitrate(rinfo, sta, sta->last_rx_rate_idx);
> +
> +}
>   static void sta_set_sinfo(struct sta_info *sta, struct station_info 
> *sinfo)

That blank line is in the wrong spot, it should be after the closing
bracket :)

johannes


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] mac80211: re-organize the rx rate calculation logic
  2012-11-26 15:08 ` Johannes Berg
@ 2012-11-27  6:20   ` Saravana
  2012-11-27  7:42     ` Saravana
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Saravana @ 2012-11-27  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: linux-wireless

On 11/26/2012 08:38 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Generally, this seems fine. Your patches are line-wrapped though.
>
I reviewed all the patches and unable to find the line-wrapped :(
Could you help me by pointing out which line is exactly getting wrapped?
So that i will figure out where exactly i am missing and will correct 
the same.
>> Signed-off-by: Saravana <saravanad@posedge.com>
>> ---
>> The diff file is generated from wireless-testing git tree.
>
> I just changed this code in mac80211-next and would appreciate if you
> would rebase onto that.
>
I am also facing the same problem in cloning the mac80211-next. once 
that is resolved, will use the mac80211-next as base and then send 
patches on top of that.
> That blank line is in the wrong spot, it should be after the closing
> bracket :)
>
will add the blank line after the closing bracket.
> johannes
>
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] mac80211: re-organize the rx rate calculation logic
  2012-11-27  6:20   ` Saravana
@ 2012-11-27  7:42     ` Saravana
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Saravana @ 2012-11-27  7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Saravana; +Cc: Johannes Berg, linux-wireless

On 11/27/2012 11:50 AM, Saravana wrote:

>>> The diff file is generated from wireless-testing git tree.
>>
>> I just changed this code in mac80211-next and would appreciate if you
>> would rebase onto that.
>>
> I am also facing the same problem in cloning the mac80211-next. once
> that is resolved, will use the mac80211-next as base and then send
> patches on top of that.

The cloning problem is solved(from Mahesh reply). Have started cloning. 
will re-submit the patch using mac80211-next as base.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-27  7:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-26 12:17 [RFC] mac80211: re-organize the rx rate calculation logic saravanad
2012-11-26 15:08 ` Johannes Berg
2012-11-27  6:20   ` Saravana
2012-11-27  7:42     ` Saravana

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).