linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] p54: zero-out rx_status
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:16:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C76A88.1030008@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201212111608.43293.chunkeey@googlemail.com>

2012.12.11. 16:08 keltezéssel, Christian Lamparter írta:
> On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 02:55:05 PM Gabor Juhos wrote:
>> In commit 'mac80211: support radiotap vendor namespace RX data'
>> new fields were added to 'struct ieee80211_rx_status'.
>> The ath5k driver does not initializes those fields and
>       ^^^^^ p54?!

Of course.

>> this can cause unexpected behaviour. The patch ensures
>> that each field gets initialized with zeroes.
> 
> Actually, when the skb is alloced/initialized by
> __alloc_skb, the skb->cb is already zeroed

Thank you for the explanation, I was not aware of this.

> (which is where the ieee80211_rx_status will be stored).
> 
> And while p54 recycles command response skbs, the 
> driver does not touch the skb->cb of 802.11 skbs,
> until the frame is destined for ieee80211_rx_irqsave.

Ok.

> If this issue just popped up now, I suspect that 
> something else is silently corrupting our SKBs 
> [or can anybody see how rt2x00 hit this issue?]

It is popped up now because we have switched to compat-wireless-2012-12-06 in
OpenWrt a few days ago. Previously we were using compat-wireless-2012-09-07.

-Gabor

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-11 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-11 13:55 [PATCH 1/3] rt2x00: zero-out rx_status Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 13:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath5k: " Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] p54: " Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 15:08   ` Christian Lamparter
2012-12-11 15:25     ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-11 15:30       ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-11 15:38         ` Christian Lamparter
2012-12-11 17:19         ` Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 17:16     ` Gabor Juhos [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C76A88.1030008@openwrt.org \
    --to=juhosg@openwrt.org \
    --cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).