From: Nicolas Cavallari <Nicolas.Cavallari@lri.fr>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@opentechinstitute.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] mac80211: in AD-HOC mode wait for the AUTH response
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:16:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EACA95.8040004@lri.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107114048.GH27589@ritirata.org>
On 07/01/2013 12:40, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:40:55AM +0100, Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
>> On 02/01/2013 07:32, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:51:08 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>>> Any chance we could converge on a single implementation here?
>>>
>>> Maybe yes :)
>>>
>>> I think that leaving the station not AUTHenticated and let userspace do so would
>>> be the best approach..but then we need a way to enable userspace to do it :)
>>
>> What would happen to old userspace that expect that to be done in the kernel ?
>
> if the userspace did not register for auth frames, then authentication will be
> handled in the kernel (as I'm doing/changing now), while if the userspace
> registered for such frames, then the kernel will assume that the authentication
> will be handled by the userspace somehow and will not deal with it (but again,
> in this way we need a command to let userspace set the AUTHenticated flag on a
> station).
That means two implementations, not one.
And even with this current patch, old wpasupplicant starts 4 way handshake as soon as the
NEW_STA event is received, even if the station is not authenticated by the kernel. I
expect that some EAPOL frames will be dropped as a result.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-10 13:40 [PATCHv3 1/2] cfg80211: add the new IBSS_STA event Antonio Quartulli
2012-12-10 13:40 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] mac80211: in AD-HOC mode wait for the AUTH response Antonio Quartulli
2012-12-28 14:51 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-02 6:32 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-02 9:40 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2013-01-07 11:40 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-07 13:16 ` Nicolas Cavallari [this message]
2013-01-25 22:05 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-26 12:09 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2013-01-29 11:37 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-29 13:59 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2013-01-29 21:50 ` Will Hawkins
2013-01-31 13:34 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-31 14:18 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2013-01-31 14:26 ` Johannes Berg
2013-04-07 21:17 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-08 7:53 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2013-04-08 9:11 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-31 14:32 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-02-01 17:11 ` [PATCH] {cfg,nl}80211: tx_mgmt: use current bss channel if omitted Nicolas Cavallari
2013-02-04 16:04 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-04 17:15 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2013-01-03 21:05 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] mac80211: in AD-HOC mode wait for the AUTH response Will Hawkins
2013-01-25 21:45 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-29 21:54 ` Will Hawkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EACA95.8040004@lri.fr \
--to=nicolas.cavallari@lri.fr \
--cc=antonio@open-mesh.com \
--cc=hawkinsw@opentechinstitute.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).