Re: wireless-regdb updated, please check!

Re: wireless-regdb updated, please check!

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

John W. Linville wrote:

> I've been sitting on some wireless-regdb patches for some time.
> Mostly this is because I wasn't sure what to do with some/most of them.
> I even still have a few more like that...
> 
> Anyway, I wanted to at least get the 60GHz bits out, and I pushed a
> few other changes as well.  Please take a look, and let me know if
> I merged anything wrong or if there is still something missing.
> 
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-regdb.git


Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org ?


How about these?

CEPT rules to ES:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000073.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000074.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000075.html

Re: wireless-regdb updated, please check!

[John W. Linville]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
> 
> > I've been sitting on some wireless-regdb patches for some time.
> > Mostly this is because I wasn't sure what to do with some/most of them.
> > I even still have a few more like that...
> > 
> > Anyway, I wanted to at least get the 60GHz bits out, and I pushed a
> > few other changes as well.  Please take a look, and let me know if
> > I merged anything wrong or if there is still something missing.
> > 
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-regdb.git
> 
> 
> Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org ?

Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually
reads that list anyway... :-(

> How about these?
> 
> CEPT rules to ES:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000073.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000074.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000075.html

Yeah, those are probably fine.  I'll try to pick those up in a few days...

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

Re: wireless-regdb updated, please check!

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 01/11/2013 10:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

>> How about these?
>>
>> CEPT rules to ES:
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000073.html
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000074.html
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000075.html

> Yeah, those are probably fine.  I'll try to pick those up in a few days...

Someone should review all others CEPT countries, because those rules
also apply to all of them.

Re: wireless-regdb updated, please check!

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 01/11/2013 10:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

>> Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org ?

> Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually
> reads that list anyway... :-(

40 people:

     14 gmail.com
      3 qca.qualcomm.com
      3 atheros.com
      1 ya.ru
      1 yahoo.com
      1 wirelessfabric.com
      1 watchguard.com
      1 virscient.com
      1 tuxdriver.com
      1 tranzeo.com
      1 slowthinkers.net
      1 sipsolutions.net
      1 samsung.com
      1 posedge.com
      1 parker.iz34.com
      1 msn.com
      1 motorola.com
      1 mork.no
      1 l2devices.com
      1 iopen.net
      1 intel.com
      1 broadcom.com
      1 axis.com

Re: [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb updated, please check!

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 01/13/2013 03:14 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:

> On 01/13/2013 02:39 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

>> On 01/11/2013 10:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote:

>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>>>>> Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org ?

>>>> Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually
>>>> reads that list anyway... :-(
>> 40 people:

> I would put my money on it that most of those are also keeping taps on
> the linux-wireless list. I know I do.

If people believe wireless-regdb ml is superfluous, should it be
removed ?

Re: [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb updated, please check!

[Arend van Spriel]

On 01/14/2013 10:35 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 03:14 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> 
>> On 01/13/2013 02:39 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> 
>>> On 01/11/2013 10:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>>>>>> Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org ?
> 
>>>>> Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually
>>>>> reads that list anyway... :-(
>>> 40 people:
> 
>> I would put my money on it that most of those are also keeping taps on
>> the linux-wireless list. I know I do.
> 
> If people believe wireless-regdb ml is superfluous, should it be
> removed ?

Not entirely what I said, but maybe John implied it. The added value of
it would be that regulatory patches are archived separately. I can see
that announcements are a gray area as you may want to reach a bigger crowd.

Gr. AvS

wireless-regdb updated, please check!

[John W. Linville]

All,

I've been sitting on some wireless-regdb patches for some time.
Mostly this is because I wasn't sure what to do with some/most of them.
I even still have a few more like that...

Anyway, I wanted to at least get the 60GHz bits out, and I pushed a
few other changes as well.  Please take a look, and let me know if
I merged anything wrong or if there is still something missing.

	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-regdb.git

Thanks!

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

Re: wireless-regdb updated, please check!

[Johannes Berg]

On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 14:39 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> All,
> 
> I've been sitting on some wireless-regdb patches for some time.
> Mostly this is because I wasn't sure what to do with some/most of them.
> I even still have a few more like that...

Could you also apply "regdb: allow 40 MHz on world roaming channels
12/13" -- we've already applied the same change to the kernel's version
of the world roaming regdomain.

johannes