From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.7.6+: ath9k: tx logic locks up after taking attenuation very high.
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:11:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5126A993.8060408@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51265AC3.5030304@candelatech.com>
On 02/21/2013 09:34 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 09:41 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 02/20/2013 05:38 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
>>> Ben Greear wrote:
>>>> For instance, in this case, why do we have pending frames, the axq-stopped,
>>>> and no axq depth? Is that an invalid state to begin with? Once
>>>> it gets in the hung state, those numbers never change. I'd assume
>>>> something should be poking more packets out of the pending frames
>>>> down into the axq logic?
>>>
>>> Something is broken in the xmit path, definitely.
>>
>> Ok, so here's a question: In the ath_tx_complete method,
>> the pending_frames counter is only decremented if txq == c->tx.txq_map[q].
>>
>> Maybe it should always be decremented?
>>
>> What kinds of things could cause txq to not equal the txq-map[q]?
>
> I put in debugging code to check for that...and I can still reproduce
> the hang without ever failing the txq == ct->tx.txq_map[q]
> test..so problem is elsewhere it seems...
Ok, I think I see the problem, or at least some of it.
When the attenuation goes very high (signal of -80 or lower),
all transmit basically stops, at least for a bit (possibly while
rate-control algorithms adjust).
During this time, the ath_tx_complete_poll_work logic can hit,
causing a reset of the NIC.
I am seeing at the end of ath_draintxq that axq->pending_frames
reports 53 (in one example).
Shouldn't pending_frames be zero after finishing the ath_draintxq?
I added some logic to force pending_frames to be zero at the end
of that method (and also added some extra logic to reset when I
detect pending_frames type hang, and now my system appears to
recover when attenuation goes back to normal levels....
I'll post my hackings as RFC shortly.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-21 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-11 18:18 3.7.6+: ath9k: tx logic locks up after taking attenuation very high Ben Greear
2013-02-12 0:11 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-13 16:41 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-19 2:14 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-19 2:36 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-19 5:18 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-20 22:51 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 1:06 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 1:38 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-21 5:41 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 17:34 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 23:11 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2013-02-21 23:49 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-21 23:53 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 23:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-22 0:11 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-22 4:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-21 1:36 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-21 2:02 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 2:04 ` Sujith Manoharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5126A993.8060408@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sujith@msujith.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).