From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Felix Fietkau" <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Piotr Haber" <phaber@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] cfg80211: configuration of Bluetooth coexistence mode
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:21:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512E40B7.7080503@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <512B61F9.60802@openwrt.org>
On 02/25/13 14:07, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2013-02-25 11:25 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 06:54 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>
>>> Most devices have some kind of connection manager that has a high-level
>>> perspective of when it's fully connected (which includes DHCP/bootp).
>>> Why not just let that connection manager set a sane maximum network
>>> latency value via pm_qos network_latency and derive btcoex weight
>>> changing and multi-channel settings from that?
>>
>> Frankly, I don't think that's going to work well. We tried using the
>> pm_qos framework once and nothing ever used it. Android isn't going to
>> change to it, so we'd be stuck with hacks like setting pm_qos in
>> wpa_supplicant which is just as awkward.
> If only the connection manager gets changed to use it, that would
> already be enough. It doesn't have to be pushed into dhcp clients and
> other applications.
Reading back some slides about pm_qos it (from Intel OSTC ;-) ) seems to
be intended to make kernel drivers aware of performance requirements in
other kernel parts or user-space. Sounds like a match here although it
is a one-to-many notification framework. Also not exactly what we want
(I think).
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-27 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 16:59 [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] cfg80211: configuration of Bluetooth coexistence mode Arend Van Spriel
2013-02-22 20:28 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-23 0:30 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-23 17:47 ` Arend Van Spriel
2013-02-24 9:12 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-02-24 17:28 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-25 5:08 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-25 5:54 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-25 10:11 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-02-25 10:25 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-25 13:07 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-27 10:27 ` Dan Williams
2013-02-27 17:44 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-02-28 11:53 ` Piotr Haber
2013-02-27 18:45 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-27 17:21 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-02-22 9:08 [RFC 0/2] control Bluetooth coexistence Piotr Haber
2013-02-22 9:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] cfg80211: configuration of Bluetooth coexistence mode Piotr Haber
2013-02-22 11:52 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-22 13:32 ` Piotr Haber
2013-02-22 14:07 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-22 14:59 ` Piotr Haber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512E40B7.7080503@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=phaber@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).