From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Simon Wunderlich <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, thomas@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de,
johannes@sipsolutions.net,
Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: Question regarding minstrel(_ht) and retry limits
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:47:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5138B69C.4000102@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130307153100.GA30608@pandem0nium>
On 2013-03-07 4:31 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> as you might be aware, it is possible to set short and long retry limits
> to specify how often a frame should be retransmitted before getting dropped.
>
> However, it appears that minstrel completely ignores any retry limit, and it is
> also not applied later in the code path. I've hacked minstrel_ht a little bit
> to apply the retry limits in minstrel_get_rate() before returning the rates
> (i.e. just cutting retries at the end from the struct ieee80211_tx_rate array).
>
> This worked for me, but is probably not clean either and might disturb minstrel
> operation. Also minstrel uses much more retries than default retry limits
> (short: 7, long: 4), so this patch might introduce behaviour changes.
>
> What is your opinion on this? Can we get it properly supported? Does it hurt
> to just use the first $retry_limit retries, and cut the rest at other rates
> at the end?
I think simply cutting off from the end of the retry chain is a bad idea
- if there are too many scheduled retries in the max throughput rate, it
will not make it to the fallback to a reliable rate if that fails. A
better approach is to make minstrel use fewer retries per rate.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-07 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-07 15:31 Question regarding minstrel(_ht) and retry limits Simon Wunderlich
2013-03-07 15:40 ` Karl Beldan
2013-03-07 18:14 ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-03-07 19:10 ` Karl Beldan
2013-03-07 15:47 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2013-03-07 18:06 ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-03-07 21:32 ` Bob Copeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5138B69C.4000102@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=thomas@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).