Re: [PATCH 3.8 1/3] ath9k_hw: fix calibration issues on chainmask that don't include chain 0

[Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>]

On 2013-03-08 10:46 AM, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 08:44 AM, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
>> On 03/07/2013 04:46 PM, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2013 03:59 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>>> On 2013-03-07 3:31 PM, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
>>>>> There is a regression introduced by this patch when power save is 
>>>>> off on
>>>>> the station for idle checks.
>>>>> I have AR9590 station with rx and tx chain set to 0x1 connected
>>>>> to legacy AP (based on Ar9390) with RF cable and 40dB attenuator.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before this patch in connection polling the station was properly 
>>>>> sending
>>>>> null function to check whether AP is still there. After this patch 
>>>>> it sends
>>>>> broadcast probe request which is anyway wrong or some 16 or so packets
>>>>> of random data (rarely). It manifests itself in lost connection 
>>>>> because
>>>>> there
>>>>> is no ack from AP which is expected for null function.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been following skb's up to the descriptor setting in ath9k 
>>>>> and it was
>>>>> all ok i.e. proper null function with valid addresses.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been bisecting it twice because it doesn't make much sense 
>>>>> but maybe
>>>>> it's a HW issue?
>>>> You're right, it does not make much sense. I can't figure out how this
>>>> patch could possibly change the runtime behavior with tx chainmask set
>>>> to 0x1. Have you tried reverting this patch in a current build to 
>>>> see if
>>>> that fixes the issue?
>>> It does fix it. I will check tomorrow whether it's only AR9590 or also
>>> previous revisions. I will also try with different chainmasks. I will 
>>> have
>>> to rescrew my setup...
>>>
>> I have been doing some tests and it seems to affect both AR9390 and 
>> AR9590.
>> To summarize: sta doesn't send null function but broadcast probe 
>> request or
>> corrupted frames in idle checking routine when power save is off and 
>> only some
>> antennas are selected for transmission.
>> So for example when I set antenna mask 7 i.e. all available it works 
>> ok but with
>> mask 1, 3 or 6 not. When I swith power save it's all ok no matter what 
>> mask I use.
>>
>> Thing with power save on is that before it goes to idle check it will 
>> go to sleep since
>> there is no traffic anyway, then we get beacon miss, it wakes up and 
>> it sends null
>> function. I guess waking up is reinitializing sth in a chip which 
>> doesn't occur in my
>> scenario.
>> HW issue?
> It will also work if I set user specified antenna masks instead of hw 
> capabilities.
What do you mean with that? How do you set the rx and tx chainmasks if
not via antenna masks? debugfs?

- Felix