linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Karl Beldan <karl.beldan@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mac80211/minstrel_ht: add support for using CCK rates
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:46:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514639B3.4050700@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130317212302.GA6886@gobelin>

On 2013-03-17 10:23 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:36:58PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 10:41 +0100, Karl Beldan wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:51:08AM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> > > When MCS rates start to get bad in 2.4 GHz because of long range or
>> > > strong interference, CCK rates can be a lot more robust.
>> > > 
>> > > This patch adds a pseudo MCS group containing CCK rates (long preamble
>> > > in the lower 4 slots, short preamble in the upper slots).
>> > > 
>> > With this, mac80211 might send CCK rates with IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU set.
>> > For aggregates, if we don't currently set NO_CCK, at the very least the
>> > 1st rate index should belong to an MCS_GROUP.
>> 
>> I guess that depends on how you expect rate control to work ... I'd
>> kinda expect the driver to skip aggregation then? I think only ath9k
>> even uses minstrel + aggregation?
>> 
> 
> This changes the meaning of IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU.
> With this there are more possible RC feedback pitfalls with the tx statuses 
> IEEE80211_TX_{CTL,STAT}_AMPDU flags.
> Regarding the drivers using minstrel + aggregation I can't really say, I
> know ath9k runs ok with it and at work I settled for minstrel too with a
> driver for our IP on a demo board.
It's important that the IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU flag is still set,
because the frame is still part of the BlockAck window, just sent with a
rate that doesn't allow aggregating it with other frames, so it is still
part of the A-MPDU session.
If there are any drivers that cannot easily be changed to support that,
we should have an explicit flag to disable using CCK with 802.11n stations.

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-17 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-13  9:51 [PATCH v4] mac80211/minstrel_ht: add support for using CCK rates Felix Fietkau
2013-02-13  9:57 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-12  9:41 ` Karl Beldan
2013-03-15 15:36   ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-17 21:23     ` Karl Beldan
2013-03-17 21:46       ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2013-03-17 22:07         ` Karl Beldan
2013-03-17 22:30           ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-17 22:40             ` Karl Beldan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514639B3.4050700@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=karl.beldan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).