From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ath9k: collect statistics about Rx-Dup and Rx-STBC packets
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:13:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517D2E77.8000104@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517D1B45.9020302@openwrt.org>
Am 28.04.2013 14:51, schrieb Felix Fietkau:
> On 2013-04-27 5:25 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Collect statistics about recived duplicate and STBC packets.
>> This information should help see if STBC is actually working.
>>
>> Tested on ar9285;
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
> I thought about this patch some more, and I'm wondering what's the point
> in doing this? These statistics are going to be completely useless for
> most people and they'll waste some memory/cpu cycles, especially on
> small-cache devices. I think it's much more useful to simply pass the
> information to mac80211 via rx flags and get them added to the radiotap
> header.
Sure.
> I'd like to keep the number of 'poor man's debug hacks' in the driver to
> a minimum,
well, i'll prefer it to call with my name: lazy man's hack ;)
> and there are some other things that I think should be
> removed: rx_frags and rx_beacons in struct ath_rx_stats, the tx/rx MAC
> sampling hack, and pretty much anything else that can be just as easily
> accessed from mac80211 through regular interfaces.
I think there is more things to do in ath9k. Create the list and we can
talk about it. For example one of it: I needed some time to understand
how some parts of code relate to the hardware. Especially Rx and Tx
descriptors. Some comments in header will help... I can add some of them
(may be it will help other beginners), but i afraid that i spend time
but my patches wont be included.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-28 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-27 15:25 [PATCH RFC] ath9k: collect statistics about Rx-Dup and Rx-STBC packets Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-27 18:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-27 18:51 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-27 18:53 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-27 19:06 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-27 19:13 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 1:21 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2013-04-28 6:41 ` [PATCH v3] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 12:51 ` [PATCH RFC] " Felix Fietkau
2013-04-28 14:13 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2013-04-28 15:03 ` [ath9k-devel] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 19:19 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 19:20 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-04-29 6:45 ` Wojciech Dubowik
2013-04-29 7:20 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 14:54 ` Ben Greear
2013-04-28 15:08 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-04-28 15:15 ` Ben Greear
2013-04-28 15:32 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-05-08 5:32 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-05-08 16:07 ` Ben Greear
2013-05-08 22:45 ` Adrian Chadd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517D2E77.8000104@rempel-privat.de \
--to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).