From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH RFC] ath9k: collect statistics about Rx-Dup and Rx-STBC packets
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:20:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517D769A.80205@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517D7626.6030109@rempel-privat.de>
On 2013-04-28 9:19 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Am 28.04.2013 17:03, schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
>> Am 28.04.2013 16:13, schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
>>> Am 28.04.2013 14:51, schrieb Felix Fietkau:
>>>> On 2013-04-27 5:25 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>>>> Collect statistics about recived duplicate and STBC packets.
>>>>> This information should help see if STBC is actually working.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on ar9285;
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
>>>> I thought about this patch some more, and I'm wondering what's the point
>>>> in doing this? These statistics are going to be completely useless for
>>>> most people and they'll waste some memory/cpu cycles, especially on
>>>> small-cache devices. I think it's much more useful to simply pass the
>>>> information to mac80211 via rx flags and get them added to the radiotap
>>>> header.
>>>
>>> Sure.
>
> Now i need some help.
> Why there is no traces of radiotap in ath9k. Some other drivers have
> them? Do it communicate in some different way or there is just no
> radiotap support in ath9k?
radiotap is generated in mac80211, so there's no need for the driver to
do it.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-28 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-27 15:25 [PATCH RFC] ath9k: collect statistics about Rx-Dup and Rx-STBC packets Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-27 18:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-27 18:51 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-27 18:53 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-27 19:06 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-27 19:13 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 1:21 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2013-04-28 6:41 ` [PATCH v3] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 12:51 ` [PATCH RFC] " Felix Fietkau
2013-04-28 14:13 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 15:03 ` [ath9k-devel] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 19:19 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 19:20 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2013-04-29 6:45 ` Wojciech Dubowik
2013-04-29 7:20 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-04-28 14:54 ` Ben Greear
2013-04-28 15:08 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-04-28 15:15 ` Ben Greear
2013-04-28 15:32 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-05-08 5:32 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-05-08 16:07 ` Ben Greear
2013-05-08 22:45 ` Adrian Chadd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517D769A.80205@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).