From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath9k_htc: add STBC TX support
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 19:32:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5182A341.8050704@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=rZrHmXD0Os-Mb40jSEywbO-7GHSqL=7iMbkzAfS=+UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 02.05.2013 18:55, schrieb Adrian Chadd:
> On 2 May 2013 01:11, Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> wrote:
>
>> +#define WLAN_RC_TX_STBC_FLAG 0x20 /* TX STBC */
>> +#define WLAN_RC_RX_STBC_FLAG 0xC0 /* RX STBC ,2 bits */
>
> I thought we covered this; why are you marking two bits here?
becouse firmware checks for two bits (and then use it as bool ;)), so i
pass what firmware can handle.
> Atheros 11n hardware only supports 1-stream STBC RX.
Did you got my email with lots of assumptions and questions?
What do you mean by 1-stream STBC RX? After i did some home work on STBC
i see that it encoded from at least two spatial streams.
Is
1-stream STBC RX = 2 spatial streams with mirrored data?
and
2-stream STBC RX = 4 spatial streams with mirrored data?
or
1-stream STBC RX = compatibility mode for one stream hardware(so only of
two streams received)?
That would make sense for 1x1:1 hardware, but if you say all atheros N
hardware support only 1-stream STBC RX, will mean that STBC is useless
on this hardware.
> Have you verified that we're actually negotiating 1-stream STBC RX
> with a peer? (Ie, by looking at packet captures?)
Yes, i wrote this too :) I verified it, we negotiate only 1-stream STBC RX.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-02 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-02 8:11 [PATCH 0/2] work sync Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-02 8:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] ath9k_htc: add STBC TX support Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-02 16:55 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-05-02 17:32 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2013-05-02 18:01 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2013-05-02 20:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-05-04 6:50 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-04 6:55 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-04 10:02 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-05-04 11:08 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-04 11:16 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-05-04 11:28 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-04 14:49 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-05-04 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-05-04 18:29 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-04 7:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-04 10:59 ` [PATCH] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v4] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-02 20:32 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] " Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-02 8:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath9k: remove useless flag conversation Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5182A341.8050704@rempel-privat.de \
--to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).