From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:41062 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752578Ab3EHPPt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 11:15:49 -0400 Message-ID: <518A6C21.5070408@candelatech.com> (sfid-20130508_171552_375075_70DA3BB7) Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 08:15:45 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sujith Manoharan CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Fun with QoS in AP mode. References: <5189DB72.3020809@candelatech.com> <20873.56643.216380.594657@gargle.gargle.HOWL> In-Reply-To: <20873.56643.216380.594657@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/07/2013 10:06 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >> We were doing some testing with ToS/QoS in some VOIP streams today. >> >> The mappings on the station machine work fine, but on the AP, the packets >> always go to the BE queue. Both systems are 3.9.0+ ath9k, recent hostapd, >> supplicant, etc. > > Is the AP running ath9k ? Yes, both AP and Station machine are ath9k, 3.9.0+, etc.... Basically identicaly hardware and software loads..just one is acting as AP and one as station(s) in this scenario. Ben > > Sujith > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com