From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:53193 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755092Ab3EMQAo (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2013 12:00:44 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.226] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r4DG0gRC019415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 09:00:42 -0700 Message-ID: <51910E2A.5090305@candelatech.com> (sfid-20130513_180050_586534_A81B0DA3) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:00:42 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Capturing on monitor interface at higher speeds? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Some quick testing showed we can only capture at around 230Mbps using tshark and writing to file (on an SSD file system). Lots of dropped pkts reported by tshark. I haven't looked yet at any details, but I'm curious if anyone has successfully captured wifi at 340Mbps+ on a moderately powerful system? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com