From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:38496 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759810Ab3EORd0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2013 13:33:26 -0400 Message-ID: <5193C6DC.40709@candelatech.com> (sfid-20130515_193329_942170_4236C470) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:33:16 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corey Richardson CC: Oleksij Rempel , ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc works poorly in 3.9 References: <5189E31F.2090200@rempel-privat.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/15/2013 10:31 AM, Corey Richardson wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> If it is an regression, can you please do "git bisect". If you can locate >> the patch which introduced this regression, it will be great. >> > > It seems to have been an intermittent problem with my WAP as well; the > PoE wasn't consistent so it kept dropping out, also taking down the > adapter with it. It does seem to be a regression, but it's so hard to > reproduce that I don't think it's worth pursuing. Sometimes I see the NIC fail to boot up on reboot of the OS. I've only tested 3.9 kernels with these NICs, as I haven't used them previously. The kernel message was something about not being able to upload firmware to the adapter...I'll grab some logs next time I see it. Thanks, Ben > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com