From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Ben Greear" <greearb@candelatech.com>,
"Felix Fietkau" <nbd@openwrt.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Another try at getting pktgen to work with wifi.
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 21:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A8F56E.4090704@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370027655.14117.17.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On 05/31/2013 09:14 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:51 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>>> What I'm saying though is that I don't see where skb->priority is even
>>> _used_ in the wifi stack. I can see it getting set, but not used.
>>
>> ieee80211_downgrade_queue
>> wme_downgrade_ac // sort of
>> ieee80211_select_queue_80211 // sort of...seems twiddling skb->priority is more of a by-product here.
>>
>> cfg80211_classify8021d
>
> None of this actually matters, it's all within the select_queue() call
> so doesn't need to store it in the skb.
>
> I found it though -- the only thing that ever looks at it is
> ieee80211_set_qos_hdr() to set the QoS header TID, and presumably that's
> what ath9k complains about (hwsim is happy to just push packets.)
Sorry to chime in. The brcmfmac uses cfg80211_classify8021d() as well
(only when skb->priority equals zero) and puts the return value in
skb->priority. But also there it is not needed as a few lines below it
uses it to determine the WWM-AC fifo.
Regards,
Arend
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-31 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 18:45 Another try at getting pktgen to work with wifi Ben Greear
2013-05-30 20:02 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-05-30 20:45 ` Ben Greear
2013-05-31 7:56 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-05-31 17:21 ` Ben Greear
2013-05-31 17:37 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-31 18:00 ` Ben Greear
2013-05-31 18:41 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-31 18:51 ` Ben Greear
2013-05-31 19:14 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-31 19:09 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2013-05-31 20:51 ` Bob Copeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A8F56E.4090704@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).