linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: limit multicast buffer hardware queue depth
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:00:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AF528B.1000402@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130605140932.GA8918@w1.fi>

On 2013-06-05 4:09 PM, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:31:54PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> The CAB (Content after Beacon) queue is used for beacon-triggered
>> transmission of buffered multicast frames. If lots of multicast frames
>> were buffered and this queue fills up, it drowns out all regular
>> traffic. To limit the damage that buffered traffic can do, try to limit
>> the queued data to becaon_interval / 8.
> 
> I'm not sure this would be compliant with the standard, but I guess
> something along these lines could be reasonable in some cases. However,
> it could be useful to take into account different DTIM Period parameters
> in the limit and instead of hardcoding this to one eight of the Beacon
> interval, the limit could be set based on Beacon interval * DTIM Period.
> Especially with large DTIM Period values, one eight of a Beacon interval
> may not be sufficient to handle even reasonable amount of group
> addressed frames.
Makes sense.

> Does this commit address More Data field updates when the driver decides
> to stop getting more frames without notifying mac80211 of this? The
> associated STAs would need to know when they can go back to sleep after
> the DTIM Beacon and the More Data field needs to be set to zero in the
> last frame the AP is sending out in the case this new limit is hit.
I'll make a new version of this patch that takes care of the More Data
field.

- Felix

      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-05 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-03 17:31 [PATCH] ath9k: limit multicast buffer hardware queue depth Felix Fietkau
2013-06-05 14:09 ` Jouni Malinen
2013-06-05 15:00   ` Felix Fietkau [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51AF528B.1000402@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).