From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: kmemleak report related to ieee80211_start_tx_ba_session, tid_start_tx locking issues?
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:21:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B8BC3E.40905@candelatech.com> (raw)
This is on 3.9.5+
I see a fair amount of these. Once again, the locking is tricky
for my poor brain, but I am suspicious of this part of things.
It seems that ampdu_mlme.mtx is used to protect the tid
arrays (although sta->lock also applies to part of it).
In ieee80211_start_tx_ba_session we are accessing and assigning the tid_start_tx
without holding the ampdu_mlme.mtx mutex.
spin_lock_bh(&sta->lock);
.....
tid_tx = rcu_dereference_protected_tid_tx(sta, tid);
/* check if the TID is not in aggregation flow already */
if (tid_tx || sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_start_tx[tid]) {
....
/*
* Finally, assign it to the start array; the work item will
* collect it and move it to the normal array.
*/
sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_start_tx[tid] = tid_tx;
Elsewhere, in ieee80211_ba_session_work, we access the tid_start_tx
without the sta->lock held, but with the ampdu_mlme.mtx held.
I think we should probably hold ampdu_mlme.mtx in ieee80211_start_tx_ba_session
or make sure we hold sta->lock in ieee80211_ba_session_work.
unreferenced object 0xffff880219b4de40 (size 192):
comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4296416789 (age 1257.971s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff815bc02c>] kmemleak_alloc+0x73/0x98
[<ffffffff8117d4b4>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x28/0x2a
[<ffffffff8117f4a6>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa5/0xcc
[<ffffffffa0365221>] ieee80211_start_tx_ba_session+0x24b/0x360 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa03a98f3>] minstrel_ht_tx_status+0x79a/0x7a9 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa035d1cd>] ieee80211_tx_status+0x3af/0x947 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa06e86fa>] ath_txq_unlock_complete+0xb0/0xbb [ath9k]
[<ffffffffa06e8992>] ath_tx_edma_tasklet+0x28d/0x2a4 [ath9k]
[<ffffffffa06e33cd>] ath9k_tasklet+0x111/0x150 [ath9k]
[<ffffffff8109d6d3>] tasklet_action+0x7d/0xcc
[<ffffffff8109db2c>] __do_softirq+0x114/0x254
[<ffffffff8109dcfe>] irq_exit+0x4b/0xa8
[<ffffffff815d481d>] do_IRQ+0x9d/0xb4
[<ffffffff815cc8ed>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x15
[<ffffffff814c8efb>] cpuidle_enter_tk+0x10/0x12
[<ffffffff814c89b5>] cpuidle_enter_state+0x17/0x3f
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-12 18:21 Ben Greear [this message]
2013-06-12 20:46 ` kmemleak report related to ieee80211_start_tx_ba_session, tid_start_tx locking issues? Johannes Berg
2013-06-12 20:58 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-12 21:01 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B8BC3E.40905@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).