From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Jean-Pierre Tosoni <jp.tosoni@acksys.fr>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: Use libnl-configurable values for retry counts
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:50:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D2DAB9.4050002@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001ce7728$18b07de0$4a1179a0$@acksys.fr>
On 2013-07-02 3:28 PM, Jean-Pierre Tosoni wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Felix Fietkau [mailto:nbd@openwrt.org]
>> > ---
>> > What I am seeking with this patch:
>> > I believe the configuration of the retries will help making recovery
>> > much faster when an AP (in infrastructure mode) or a peer (in mesh
>> > mode) suddenly disappears.
>> I'm all for reducing retries, but I think the way you're applying the
>> limit is problematic.
>> If minstrel decides to use many retries for a high rate and you're
>> simply cutting off all retries that exceed the configured limit, you're
>> potentially inviting quite a bit of unnecessary packet loss.
>> I'm planning to remove the use of retry rate slot 4 (fallback to lowest
>> rate) from minstrel, since max_prob_rate should already provide quite
>> decent reliability.
>
> Well, on one hand, people who want to reduce retries are more concerned with
> low latency and jitter than with reliable delivery of data.
Makes sense.
> On another hand the code should work for any rate control plugin, not just
> minstrel.
But much more important than that is to not cause regressions for other
people via aggressive packet dropping.
> Finally this code is executed for each frame, and I don’t want to bloat it
> more than necessary...
If you put the code in minstrel (and minstrel_ht), it not only allows
making a better tradeoff for retry handling, the code also doesn't have
to be run for every single packet. You can run it during the rate
control stats update.
The reduction of retry attempts definitely needs to be balanced
properly. Retries with max_prob_rate can be more important than retries
with max_tp_rate, but there needs to be a minimum for each of those.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-27 16:40 [RFC v2] mac80211: Use libnl-configurable values for retry counts Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-06-29 20:08 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-01 8:34 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-01 9:04 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-02 13:28 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-02 13:50 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2013-07-02 17:40 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-02 18:05 ` Felix Fietkau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D2DAB9.4050002@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=jp.tosoni@acksys.fr \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).