From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Jean-Pierre Tosoni <jp.tosoni@acksys.fr>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: Use libnl-configurable values for retry counts
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:05:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D3167D.3070000@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000101ce774b$3925e380$ab71aa80$@acksys.fr>
On 2013-07-02 7:40 PM, Jean-Pierre Tosoni wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Sorry to use your time again...
>
>> But much more important than that is to not cause regressions for other
>> people via aggressive packet dropping.
>
> Agreed, but see below.
>
>> If you put the code in minstrel (and minstrel_ht), it not only allows
>> making a better tradeoff for retry handling, the code also doesn't have
>> to be run for every single packet. You can run it during the rate
>> control stats update.
>
> OK, I'll have a look at that part now.
>
>>
>> The reduction of retry attempts definitely needs to be balanced
>> properly. Retries with max_prob_rate can be more important than retries
>> with max_tp_rate, but there needs to be a minimum for each of those.
>
> This leads to a question about regressions and backward compatibility:
>
> Since minstrel can compute as much as 28 retries for a frame,
> And since the (standard) default value for "short_frame_max_tx_count" is 7,
>
> ... there is no way I can enforce the configured value while keeping
> minstrel counts by default !
> The standard itself gives a very aggressive limit! Or am I mistaken about
> the significance of this configuration parameter ?
I think you're right about this. Specifically because the standard limit
is much lower than what is being used now, we need to really make sure
that it's applied in a way that it does not harm the normal use case in
any visible way.
- Felix
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-27 16:40 [RFC v2] mac80211: Use libnl-configurable values for retry counts Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-06-29 20:08 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-01 8:34 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-01 9:04 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-02 13:28 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-02 13:50 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-02 17:40 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-02 18:05 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D3167D.3070000@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=jp.tosoni@acksys.fr \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).