From: "José Miguel Gonçalves" <jose.goncalves@inov.pt>
To: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
Cc: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wl127x: Unable to associate with a WPA2-PSK AP
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:12:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DD6BCB.9000704@inov.pt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373446089.8385.7.camel@cumari.coelho.fi>
On 10-07-2013 09:48, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 14:22 +0100, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
>> On 09-07-2013 13:42, Arik Nemtsov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:27 PM, José Miguel Gonçalves
>>> <jose.goncalves@inov.pt> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any more ideas on how to debug this? Is there any specific debug_level mask
>>>> that can apply to the driver to help it?
>>> You can try the mask 0x63c20 (it's pretty verbose, so I would put it
>>> in pastebin).
>>>
>>> Perhaps this is a genuine problem with the antenna of the card?
>> Nope. The AP is 1 meter away form my board (even without antenna in the
>> card it should associate).
> Too strong a signal can also cause problems, because of distortion.
>
>
>>> Can
>>> you verify the RSSI of the AP is ok using iw?
>> The iw output:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/XmEzqjHs
> This looks okay, but the RSSI value cannot be trusted blindly. There
> are other factors that can influence the signal quality, such as the
> SNR.
>
>
>> The dmesg output with debug mask set to 0x63c20:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/zGE0Gfp8
>>
>> Note that with debug activated I did not see the driver's "Beacon loss
>> detected" messages.
> There could be some timing issue here. Is it always like that? Do you
> *always* see the "Beacon loss" messages without debugging and *never*
> with debugging?
>
Yep, is always like that!
José Gonçalves
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-10 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-08 18:54 wl127x: Unable to associate with a WPA2-PSK AP José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-08 19:08 ` Arik Nemtsov
2013-07-08 22:47 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-09 7:21 ` Arik Nemtsov
2013-07-09 9:09 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-09 9:33 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-09 9:40 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-09 11:27 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-09 12:42 ` Arik Nemtsov
2013-07-09 13:22 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-09 19:10 ` Arik Nemtsov
2013-07-09 23:59 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-10 9:22 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-10 12:34 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-10 16:30 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-10 17:17 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-10 17:48 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-10 18:16 ` Larry Finger
2013-07-10 20:29 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-10 20:27 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-11 12:08 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-11 13:29 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-11 13:33 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-11 13:59 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-11 17:34 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-11 18:26 ` José Miguel Gonçalves
2013-07-10 8:48 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-10 14:12 ` José Miguel Gonçalves [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DD6BCB.9000704@inov.pt \
--to=jose.goncalves@inov.pt \
--cc=arik@wizery.com \
--cc=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).