From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:53538 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753911Ab3IKScE (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:32:04 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.100] ([79.218.107.113]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LanoO-1VmGCI132e-00kR8a for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:32:02 +0200 Message-ID: <5230B721.40104@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130911_203208_520996_4FAB4A88) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:32:01 +0200 From: Oleksij Rempel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: correct way to reduce traffic needed for LED triggering Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello all, what is correct way to reduce IO needed for LED blinking? I did it with ieee80211_queue_delayed_work(.., &priv->led-work, msecs_to_jiffird(HZ)); or are there other way to regulate it? -- Regards, Oleksij