From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"s.neumann@raumfeld.com" <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>,
"afenkart@gmail.com" <afenkart@gmail.com>,
"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"johannes.berg@intel.com" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mwifiex: queue main work from main process when bailing on races
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 01:00:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52378D81.3070707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430F44C5849E@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
Hi Bing,
On 16.09.2013 23:14, Bing Zhao wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
>> index ff4ed96..0700bc2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
>> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ int mwifiex_main_process(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
>> /* Check if already processing */
>> if (adapter->mwifiex_processing) {
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->main_proc_lock, flags);
>> + queue_work(adapter->workqueue, &adapter->main_work);
>
> This is specific to SDIO interface,
Is it really? By checking adapter->mwifiex_processing, the driver seems
to expect mwifiex_main_process() to be called from multiple execution
paths, and in that case, we will always loose one execution cycle in
case we bail early. I actually wonder why this didn't hit us earlier,
but I might miss a detail.
OTOH, the worst thing that can happen if the function is executed too
often is that it exits early and does nothing.
> + if (adapter->iface_type == MWIFIEX_SDIO)
> + queue_work(adapter->workqueue, &adapter->main_work);
I can of course add this, but I don't fully understand why the driver
takes care of concurrently running executing paths and then just bails
silently in case a race is detected.
Best regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-16 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-16 11:39 [PATCH] mwifiex: fix command timeout with SDIO interrupts enabled Daniel Mack
2013-09-16 11:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] mwifiex: queue main work from main process when bailing on races Daniel Mack
2013-09-16 21:14 ` Bing Zhao
2013-09-16 23:00 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2013-09-17 18:19 ` Bing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52378D81.3070707@gmail.com \
--to=zonque@gmail.com \
--cc=afenkart@gmail.com \
--cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=s.neumann@raumfeld.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).