From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Floris Van den Abeele <floris.vandenabeele@intec.ugent.be>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lower throughput in Ad-hoc than in Infrastructure mode?
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:29:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525D4347.5020902@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525CEE98.3010300@intec.ugent.be>
On 2013-10-15 9:28 AM, Floris Van den Abeele wrote:
> While running throughput experiments using iperf I noticed that UDP
> throughput in ad-hoc mode was considerably lower than in Infrastructure
> mode. The setups I'm comparing is a 802.11a ad-hoc network consisting of
> two clients vs a 802.11a infrastructure network consisting of an access
> point and a client (11a because the tests were run in the 5GHz band).
>
> For ad-hoc mode I'm consistenly seeing a lower throughput than for
> infrastructure mode: i.e. 22.4 Mbits/sec vs 28.2 Mbits/sec. Note that
> while sniffing the medium radiotap headers report a PHY data rate of
> 54Mbit/s in both cases. There is no other traffic on the Wi-Fi channel
> in question (44). Considering the medium access for both setups is
> similair I would expect to find similair throughputs. Is this a known
> issue with the linux wireless/mac80211/ath9k driver stack or is this
> behaviour conform the 802.11 standard (based on my knowledge I would say
> no to the latter)? My test specs are below.
>
> For testing I'm using Sparklan WPEA-111N NIC's (AR9280). The nodes are
> running OpenWrt attitude adjusment on r32482 (from 2012-06-21) with the
> REGD patch enabled. I believe that this build of OpenWRT uses the
> compat-wireless-2012-06-14.tar.bz2 drivers.
I'd suggest that you try a recent version of OpenWrt before
investigating further.
- Felix
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 7:28 Lower throughput in Ad-hoc than in Infrastructure mode? Floris Van den Abeele
2013-10-15 13:29 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525D4347.5020902@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=floris.vandenabeele@intec.ugent.be \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox