linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] use ether_addr_equal_64bits
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:02:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D9A85E.8070306@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140117212410.GA13930@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 668 bytes --]

Am 17.01.2014 22:24, schrieb Pavel Machek:
> On Mon 2013-12-30 19:14:56, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> Ether_addr_equal_64bits is more efficient than ether_addr_equal, and can be
>> used when each argument is an array within a structure that contains at
>> least two bytes of data beyond the array.
> 
> I mean, yes, it is probably faster, and yes, most structures probably
> contain two more bytes, but... is the uglyness worth the speedup? I'd
> say this should not be done except in very time-critical places...
> 									Pavel

This code run on every received beacon, almost on every wifi driver (If
i understand what you mean.)

-- 
Regards,
Oleksij


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-17 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-30 18:14 [PATCH 0/11] use ether_addr_equal_64bits Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/11] rt2x00: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-31 16:44   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2013-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/11] ath5k: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/11] mac80211: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:10   ` Christian Lamparter
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 4/11] " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:56   ` Johannes Berg
2013-12-30 19:58     ` Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 21:25       ` Johannes Berg
2013-12-30 21:57         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-12-30 23:13           ` Johannes Berg
2013-12-30 23:17             ` Joe Perches
2013-12-31  6:32               ` Julia Lawall
2013-12-31 15:54                 ` Ben Greear
2013-12-31 16:09                   ` Julia Lawall
2013-12-31 16:27                     ` Ben Greear
2013-12-31 16:40                       ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06  9:05                         ` Johannes Berg
2014-01-06  9:09                           ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06 10:17                             ` Johannes Berg
2014-01-06  8:48               ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06  8:59                 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-06  9:04                   ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06  9:07                     ` Johannes Berg
2014-01-06  9:20                       ` Julia Lawall
2013-12-31  6:26             ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2014-01-06  9:24               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-06  9:35                 ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06 15:18                 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-06 10:48             ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-17 10:18               ` Dan Carpenter
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 5/11] mwl8k: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 6/11] rtlwifi: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 21:08   ` Larry Finger
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 7/11] iwlegacy: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 8/11] " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 9/11] ipw2x00: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] at76c50x-usb: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] carl9170: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:10   ` Christian Lamparter
2014-01-17 21:24 ` [PATCH 0/11] " Pavel Machek
2014-01-17 22:02   ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2014-01-17 22:43     ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D9A85E.8070306@rempel-privat.de \
    --to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).