linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rtlwifi: rtl8723be: Add new driver
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:00:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <531C0363.2090302@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140306215449.GA16213@elgon.mountain>

On 03/06/2014 03:54 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> Sorry to bother you about this, because I know we see this same bug
> every time we add another Realtek driver and you must be as sick of it
> as I am...  :/
>
> The patch a619d1abe20c: "rtlwifi: rtl8723be: Add new driver" from Feb
> 28, 2014, leads to the following static checker warning:
>
> 	drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8723be/phy.c:667 _rtl8723be_store_tx_power_by_rate()
> 	error: buffer overflow 'rtlphy->tx_power_by_rate_offset[band]' 4 <= 5
>
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8723be/phy.c
>    646  static void _rtl8723be_store_tx_power_by_rate(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>     647                                                u32 band, u32 rfpath,
>     648                                                u32 txnum, u32 regaddr,
>     649                                                u32 bitmask, u32 data)
>     650  {
>     651          struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
>     652          struct rtl_phy *rtlphy = &(rtlpriv->phy);
>     653          u8 rate_section = _rtl8723be_get_rate_section_index(regaddr);
>     654
>     655          if (band != BAND_ON_2_4G && band != BAND_ON_5G)
>     656                  RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_POWER, PHY_TXPWR,
>     657                           "Invalid Band %d\n", band);
>     658
>     659          if (rfpath > MAX_RF_PATH)
>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^
> This should be >= TX_PWR_BY_RATE_NUM_RF.  We should return on error
> instead of printing an error and then corrupting memory.
>
> I don't know what to do here to make these bugs go away...
>
>     660                  RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_POWER, PHY_TXPWR,
>     661                           "Invalid RfPath %d\n", rfpath);
>     662
>     663          if (txnum > MAX_RF_PATH)
>     664                  RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_POWER, PHY_TXPWR,
>     665                           "Invalid TxNum %d\n", txnum);
>     666
>     667          rtlphy->tx_power_by_rate_offset[band][rfpath][txnum][rate_section] =
>     668                                                                          data;
>     669  }

Thanks for pointing to these problems.

BTW, what static checker found the problem? I ran the latest Smatch and it did 
not find it.

Larry



  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-09  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-06 21:54 rtlwifi: rtl8723be: Add new driver Dan Carpenter
2014-03-09  6:00 ` Larry Finger [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-19 15:10 Dan Carpenter
2015-10-19 18:26 ` Jakub Sitnicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=531C0363.2090302@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).