linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@gmail.com>,
	ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Firmware debugging patches?
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 08:39:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <539483B1.5020401@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8738ffiysv.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>



On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:
>
>>>> Perhaps the time-stamp is good enough?  I don't see a need for
>>>> a uuid, but perhaps I am missing something?
>>>
>>> UUID is supposed to be unique. If we use walltime there's no guarantee
>>> that the clock is correct and if we use local_clock() (my preference) it
>>> will be reset after every boot.
>>>
>>> I just think using something like UUID is more robust. Especially if one
>>> implements an automatic crash dump collector from thousands of deployed
>>> APs, having an UUID makes it a lot easier to manage.
>>
>> I can add since-boot timestamp as well.  Time-since-boot is less likely
>> to be unique than wall-time, and for systems that do have proper wall-time
>> clock configured, I think that provides some useful info.  (Would be interesting
>> if all APs in a stadium crashed near the same time, for instance.)
>>
>> I was thinking we should not add a MAC to the dump, for privacy concerns,
>> but whatever user-space tools gather the dump could add MAC if user perfers.
>
> The MAC addresses can be extracted from the target memory anyway so I
> don't see harm from including that in the dump. Is it even possible to
> address all privacy issues when dealing with firmware dumps?

It would be more difficult to find it in debug-log messages (and in most cases,
it is probably not the debug-log at all).  Probably not in the stack dump
most of the time either.

I'm not sure it will be in the BSS regions or not.  I have no plans to dump the
non-bss RAM on the firmware because I have no tools that can decode it anyway,
so probably the patches I've posted so far are relatively OK as far as privacy
is concerned.  Someone who is very paranoid should not be using this feature
anyway.


>> With time-of-day, time-since-boot, and MAC, each dump should be unique.
>
> But I would like to easily match from kernel log that the crash dump
> matches with log. uuid would provide that in a simple way (check that
> the uuid in the log matches with the uuid in the dump). What's so bad
> from using uuid?

Just tell me how you want me to create the uuid and I'll do so.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-08 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <53891ACD.7070902@candelatech.com>
     [not found] ` <87wqczz3h9.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
     [not found]   ` <538CA904.4000508@candelatech.com>
     [not found]     ` <87ioojz1b1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
2014-06-02 17:42       ` Firmware debugging patches? Ben Greear
2014-06-02 18:46         ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2014-06-02 18:58           ` Ben Greear
2014-06-02 19:29             ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2014-06-02 19:48               ` Ben Greear
2014-06-04 19:23                 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2014-06-04 19:29                   ` Ben Greear
2014-06-05 11:10                     ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-05 15:51                       ` Ben Greear
2014-06-05 11:06                 ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-05 15:57                   ` Ben Greear
2014-06-06  6:51                     ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-06 16:02                       ` Ben Greear
2014-06-07 13:03                         ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-07 15:27                           ` Ben Greear
2014-06-08  8:35                             ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-08  9:13                               ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-08 16:01                                 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2014-06-08 15:39                               ` Ben Greear [this message]
2014-06-09  8:17                                 ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-09 15:09                                   ` Ben Greear
2014-06-09 15:47                                     ` Ben Greear
2014-06-09 16:27                                       ` Ben Greear
2014-06-10  6:05                                         ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-10 15:06                                           ` Ben Greear
2014-06-26 15:26                                           ` Ben Greear
2014-06-26 16:01                                             ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-05 10:58             ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-05 15:59               ` Ben Greear
2014-06-05 10:51         ` Kalle Valo
2014-06-05 16:03           ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=539483B1.5020401@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=egrumbach@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).