From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
<linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] mac80211: Resolve sk_refcnt/sk_wmem_alloc issue in wifi ack path
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:38:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54116D8E.20308@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410419198.1825.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On 09/11/14 09:06, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 18:05 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> There is a possible issue with the use, or lack thereof of sk_refcnt and
>> sk_wmem_alloc in the wifi ack status functionality.
>>
>> Specifically if a socket were to request acknowledgements, and the socket
>> were to have sk_refcnt drop to 0 resulting in it waiting on sk_wmem_alloc
>> to reach 0 it would be possible to have sock_queue_err_skb orphan the last
>> buffer, resulting in __sk_free being called on the socket. After this the
>> buffer is enqueued on sk_error_queue, however the queue has already been
>> flushed resulting in at least a memory leak, if not a data corruption.
>
> Oh. Thanks :-)
Hi Alexander,
So why is this only an issue in wifi ack path. The sock_queue_err_skb()
does not mention the caller should hold a sock reference. This seems
entirely an issue of the sock_queue_err_skb() function itself so why not
do sk_hold/sk_put within that function. Does it impose too much overhead?
Regards,
Arend
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 22:04 [PATCH net-next 0/2] Address reference counting issues with sock_queue_err_skb Alexander Duyck
2014-09-10 22:05 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] skb: Add documentation for skb_clone_sk Alexander Duyck
2014-09-10 22:05 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] mac80211: Resolve sk_refcnt/sk_wmem_alloc issue in wifi ack path Alexander Duyck
2014-09-11 7:06 ` Johannes Berg
2014-09-11 9:38 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2014-09-11 14:40 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-09-11 15:21 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-09-11 15:53 ` Johannes Berg
2014-09-12 21:51 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] Address reference counting issues with sock_queue_err_skb David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54116D8E.20308@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).