From: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com>
To: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org,
kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com, mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: ignore radar PHY errors when DFS is not enabled
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:08:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B50AA1.3040402@neratec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3155015.RnApTRDnnO@prime>
On 01/13/2015 12:04 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2015 11:16:02 Zefir Kurtisi wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> I did not dig how the hw->conf.radar_enabled flag is set in monitor mode,
>> but if it is same as for master (i.e. set for DFS channels), then it would
>> be a better approach to prevent calling ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr()
>> altogether from ath9k_rx_skb_preprocess() if not set.
>
> Hm, you mean like - if radar_enabled then dfs_process, otherwise fft_process?
> That would might be more elegant indeed ...
>
More concrete / restrictive:
* if radar_enabled
- spectral must not be enabled
- only ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr() has to be processed
* if !radar_enabled
- don't process ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr()
> The monitor mode does not have the radar flag enabled,
> cfg80211_chandef_dfs_required() returns 0 in this case.
>
Ah, which then means you can not do (supplemental) CACs with a monitor
out-of-the-box? For that, radar_enabled would need to be set for monitor, which
basically should not harm for a fully passive interface.
>>
>> And while you're at that: slaves do not need to scan for radar, might be
>> worth checking if it makes sense to selectively disable radar detection in
>> STA mode. I am using attached private OpenWRT patch for that - which still
>> would interfere with spectral scanning. Generally, the PHY_ERROR processing
>> should be reworked but becomes quite complicated when you take into account
>> special use-cases. Think of radar events being treated differently
>> depending on whether a master or a monitor detected them (OC-CAC vs. ISM).
>
> I didn't check if that is enforced correctly, but
> cfg80211_chandef_dfs_required() returns if radar is required for the various
> interface types - AP, Adhoc and Mesh have it enabled if its a DFS channel,
> client, monitor, etc don't have it enabled. That gets marked in the sdata-
>> radar_required, and ieee80211_is_radar_required() checks all interfaces if
> there is any interface which needs radar. So that should have been taken care
> of.
>
> Therefore I think that this is already handled in cfg80211/mac80211 and ath9k
> should not check the iftype at all, but only check the radar_enabled flag.
>
Ok, thanks for clarifying that - one private patch less to handle :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-09 16:54 [PATCH] ath9k: ignore radar PHY errors when DFS is not enabled Simon Wunderlich
2015-01-09 18:57 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-10 16:26 ` Simon Wunderlich
2015-01-13 10:16 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2015-01-13 11:04 ` Simon Wunderlich
2015-01-13 12:08 ` Zefir Kurtisi [this message]
2015-01-15 14:30 ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-15 15:58 ` Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B50AA1.3040402@neratec.com \
--to=zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).