From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:45163 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751285AbbAMQPD (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:15:03 -0500 Message-ID: <54B54485.50803@candelatech.com> (sfid-20150113_171507_688440_112E4037) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:15:01 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kalle Valo CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ath10k: scan should handle scan-start-failed event properly. References: <1421090992-14971-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <54B42622.5090404@candelatech.com> <874mru7q5a.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <874mru7q5a.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/13/2015 05:42 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ben Greear writes: > >> Sorry about the resends...had mail-server issue, should be resolved now. > > So which one should I look at? Or are the patches the same in both sets? All the same. Ben > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com