From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:56787 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751252AbbCKVH4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:07:56 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (unknown [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A881440B7F0 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5500AEAB.8010605@candelatech.com> (sfid-20150311_220759_158741_7D37E09B) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:07:55 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: mac80211-hwsim and tx-rates. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: When using the user-space transport, the netlink frame sent to user-space has a rate index and retry count, and nothing else. Is there a reliable way to know in user-space what index maps to what actual rate? If not, any suggestions for how to improve this? Maybe add a new object that passes up a bunch more info about the actual rates instead of just the rate idx? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com