From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:65275 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932151AbbDJHbY (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 03:31:24 -0400 Message-ID: <55277C47.4080201@nod.at> (sfid-20150410_093129_238364_BD39CF42) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:31:19 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches , Steven Rostedt CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org, lauro.venancio@openbossa.org, davem@davemloft.net, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kaber@trash.net, pablo@netfilter.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] netfilter: Fix format string of nfnetlink_log proc file References: <1428616637-21690-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1428616637-21690-5-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1428619177.5413.15.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <1428619177.5413.15.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 10.04.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Joe Perches: > On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 23:57 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> The printed values are all of type unsigned integer, therefore use >> %u instead of %d. Otherwise an user can face negative values. > > Hey Richard. > > Just to clarify, this patch is for net and not for net-next > as net-next has removed the seq_printf return uses. > > Are you going to submit an equivalent patch for net-next? Hmm, you are right. It took me a few minutes to figure out what happened because I did rebase my patches to net-next and fixed up 5/5 already. Reading yesterday's bash history shows that I've used git format-patch in a wrong way such that the comments from the old branch were taken. Thanks, //richard