* [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix invalid access to struct acpi_device fields
@ 2015-05-27 17:31 Arend van Spriel
2015-05-28 8:29 ` Kalle Valo
2015-05-28 16:48 ` [PATCH] " Jason Andryuk
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arend van Spriel @ 2015-05-27 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo; +Cc: linux-wireless, Arend van Spriel, Fu, Zhonghui
The fields of struct acpi_device are only known when CONFIG_ACPI is
defined. Fix this by using a helper function. This will resolve the
issue found in linux-next:
../brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c: In function 'brcmf_ops_sdio_probe':
../brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c:1139:7: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
adev->flags.power_manageable = 0;
^
Fixes: commit f0992ace680c ("brcmfmac: prohibit ACPI power management ...")
Cc: Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
index b0d0ff5..71779b9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
@@ -1117,6 +1117,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, brcmf_sdmmc_ids);
static struct brcmfmac_sdio_platform_data *brcmfmac_sdio_pdata;
+static void brcmf_sdiod_acpi_set_power_manageable(struct device *dev,
+ int val)
+{
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
+ struct acpi_device *adev;
+
+ adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+ if (adev)
+ adev->flags.power_manageable = 0;
+#endif
+}
+
static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
const struct sdio_device_id *id)
{
@@ -1124,7 +1136,6 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev;
struct brcmf_bus *bus_if;
struct device *dev;
- struct acpi_device *adev;
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter\n");
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Class=%x\n", func->class);
@@ -1132,11 +1143,9 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "sdio device ID: 0x%04x\n", func->device);
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Function#: %d\n", func->num);
- /* prohibit ACPI power management for this device */
dev = &func->dev;
- adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
- if (adev)
- adev->flags.power_manageable = 0;
+ /* prohibit ACPI power management for this device */
+ brcmf_sdiod_acpi_set_power_manageable(dev, 0);
/* Consume func num 1 but dont do anything with it. */
if (func->num == 1)
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: brcmfmac: fix invalid access to struct acpi_device fields
2015-05-27 17:31 [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix invalid access to struct acpi_device fields Arend van Spriel
@ 2015-05-28 8:29 ` Kalle Valo
2015-05-28 16:48 ` [PATCH] " Jason Andryuk
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2015-05-28 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arend van Spriel; +Cc: linux-wireless, Arend van Spriel, Fu, Zhonghui
> The fields of struct acpi_device are only known when CONFIG_ACPI is
> defined. Fix this by using a helper function. This will resolve the
> issue found in linux-next:
>
> ../brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c: In function 'brcmf_ops_sdio_probe':
> ../brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c:1139:7: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> adev->flags.power_manageable = 0;
> ^
>
> Fixes: f0992ace680c ("brcmfmac: prohibit ACPI power management ...")
> Cc: Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers-next.git.
Kalle Valo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix invalid access to struct acpi_device fields
2015-05-27 17:31 [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix invalid access to struct acpi_device fields Arend van Spriel
2015-05-28 8:29 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2015-05-28 16:48 ` Jason Andryuk
2015-05-28 18:31 ` Arend van Spriel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason Andryuk @ 2015-05-28 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arend van Spriel; +Cc: Kalle Valo, linux-wireless, Fu, Zhonghui
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> index b0d0ff5..71779b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> @@ -1117,6 +1117,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, brcmf_sdmmc_ids);
> static struct brcmfmac_sdio_platform_data *brcmfmac_sdio_pdata;
>
>
> +static void brcmf_sdiod_acpi_set_power_manageable(struct device *dev,
> + int val)
> +{
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> +
> + adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> + if (adev)
> + adev->flags.power_manageable = 0;
Shouldn't this be " = val"?
-Jason
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> const struct sdio_device_id *id)
> {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix invalid access to struct acpi_device fields
2015-05-28 16:48 ` [PATCH] " Jason Andryuk
@ 2015-05-28 18:31 ` Arend van Spriel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arend van Spriel @ 2015-05-28 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Andryuk; +Cc: Kalle Valo, linux-wireless, Fu, Zhonghui
On 05/28/15 18:48, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Arend van Spriel<arend@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>> index b0d0ff5..71779b9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>> @@ -1117,6 +1117,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, brcmf_sdmmc_ids);
>> static struct brcmfmac_sdio_platform_data *brcmfmac_sdio_pdata;
>>
>>
>> +static void brcmf_sdiod_acpi_set_power_manageable(struct device *dev,
>> + int val)
>> +{
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
>> + struct acpi_device *adev;
>> +
>> + adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
>> + if (adev)
>> + adev->flags.power_manageable = 0;
>
> Shouldn't this be " = val"?
Definitely. The only place where it is called uses 0 for val parameter
so there is no big issue, but I will fix it.
Thanks for spotting that bit.
Regards,
Arend
> -Jason
>
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
>> const struct sdio_device_id *id)
>> {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-28 18:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-27 17:31 [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix invalid access to struct acpi_device fields Arend van Spriel
2015-05-28 8:29 ` Kalle Valo
2015-05-28 16:48 ` [PATCH] " Jason Andryuk
2015-05-28 18:31 ` Arend van Spriel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).