From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: remove duplicated routine in _rtl92c_phy_rf6052_config_parafile
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:37:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5571C21E.1050101@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433512898-30137-1-git-send-email-ap420073@gmail.com>
On 06/05/2015 09:01 AM, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> in the _rtl92c_phy_rf6052_config_parafile(), RF90_PATH_A and
> RF90_PATH_B are same routine. so i remove one of these routine.
> also the return routine is duplicated. so i remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
The code changes are OK, but the commit message needs some work. The phrase
"RF90_PATH_A and RF90_PATH_B are same routine" should be changed to "cases
RF90_PATH_A and RF90_PATH_B call the same routine".
Larry
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c
> index b878d56..8ce055c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c
> @@ -452,9 +452,6 @@ static bool _rtl92c_phy_rf6052_config_parafile(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
> udelay(1);
> switch (rfpath) {
> case RF90_PATH_A:
> - rtstatus = rtl92cu_phy_config_rf_with_headerfile(hw,
> - (enum radio_path) rfpath);
> - break;
> case RF90_PATH_B:
> rtstatus = rtl92cu_phy_config_rf_with_headerfile(hw,
> (enum radio_path) rfpath);
> @@ -483,7 +480,6 @@ static bool _rtl92c_phy_rf6052_config_parafile(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
> }
> }
> RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_INIT, DBG_TRACE, "<---\n");
> - return rtstatus;
> phy_rf_cfg_fail:
> return rtstatus;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-05 14:01 [PATCH 1/3] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: remove duplicated routine in _rtl92c_phy_rf6052_config_parafile Taehee Yoo
2015-06-05 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: debug message change "RTL8192CE" to "RTL8192CU" Taehee Yoo
2015-06-05 15:33 ` Larry Finger
2015-06-05 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: Fix variable isfirst_ampdu Taehee Yoo
2015-06-05 15:31 ` Larry Finger
2015-06-05 15:37 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2015-06-06 4:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: remove duplicated routine in _rtl92c_phy_rf6052_config_parafile Taehee Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5571C21E.1050101@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).