Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192c: Add init codes for "fw_version" and "fw_subversion".

[Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>]

On 06/06/2015 06:02 AM, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> The variable "fw_version" is used in the _ResetDigitalProcedure1().
> but It is not initialized. so I add init codes for "fw_version" and
> "fw_subversion".
>
> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c
> index 29983bc..9b5ce28 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ int rtl92c_download_fw(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>   	pfwheader = (struct rtl92c_firmware_header *)rtlhal->pfirmware;
>   	pfwdata = (u8 *)rtlhal->pfirmware;
>   	fwsize = rtlhal->fwsize;
> +	rtlhal->fw_version = pfwheader->version;
> +	rtlhal->fw_subversion = pfwheader->subversion;
>
>   	if (IS_FW_HEADER_EXIST(pfwheader)) {
>   		RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_FW, DBG_DMESG,

This patch is not correct. If the firmware does not have a header, then you will 
be changing fw_version and fw_subversion to random bytes from the body of the 
firmware. At present, they are initialized to zero as part of the rtl_priv 
struct. You need to move the two new statements inside the IS_FW_HEADER_EXIST 
test, but before pfwdata is adjusted to remove the header.

Larry