From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:38949 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933490AbbFJT3d (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:29:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (unknown [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 466F340A4C5 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5578901C.60502@candelatech.com> (sfid-20150610_212943_327894_FFEA768B) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:29:32 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Allowing station to over-ride default VHT-oper element? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I'm trying to figure out how to make a VHT station with hardware capable of 80Mhz width instead force itself to advertise/use just 40Mhz width, but still support VHT. Similar to how the VHT-capabilities overrides works, but for VHT-operation. First, is this even a valid thing to do, or does VHT imply that stations are always available to do 80Mhz? And second, if it is a valid thing to do, any hints on a proper way to go about this. I'm getting a bit tangled in the code trying to figure out where to apply any overloads properly. Possibly in ieee80211_determine_chantype? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com