From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:48149 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751605AbbFKNQa (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:16:30 -0400 Message-ID: <55798A2C.7070300@candelatech.com> (sfid-20150611_151633_395926_3E3E6773) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 06:16:28 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJl?= =?UTF-8?B?Y2tp?= CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Exposing enum ieee80211_channel_flags to user References: <1434015922.1915.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1434016002.1915.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150611_120017_614164_3F327AEA) <1434016900.1915.8.camel@sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1434016900.1915.8.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/11/2015 03:01 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 12:00 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >>> Upon rereading, I think my preference would be to remove much of the >>> channel list information and add a separate iw command. >> >> Do you mean removing channel list from "iw phy X info"? > > I'm not sure I'd remove it completely - but perhaps remove all the > detail information like DFS time etc. that's just making it really > large? I.e. go back to just having a single line of information. > >> Can you suggest the new command name? > > "iw phy X channels" would work? Maybe also allow the full dump with an optional --verbose flag: 'iw --verbose phy X info' ? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com