From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on beacon-miss offloading.
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:22:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557AF925.4000609@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPxzYK6LWZW1JWoBBTs_QPWtupU17Pr7w3J-H6=QD1Xd5uLrg@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/12/2015 07:10 AM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/11/2015 11:03 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 June 2015 at 01:38, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/11/2015 02:07 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> In my ath10k CT firmware, I am disabling the beacon-miss offloading
>>>>> to save space and because it will not work with lots of virtual
>>>>> stations.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, it must be that I need some way to tell the stack that this
>>>>> feature is not enabled, because when suddenly kill my AP, then
>>>>> the ath10k station connected to it shows endless 'beacon loss' events
>>>>> in 'iw events' output, but it never actually loses connection.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stock firmware works fine, so probably I just need to disable
>>>>> some feature flag when registering the ath10k hardware
>>>>> when using CT firmware.
>>>>>
>>>>> With stock firmware, I see a quick dissassociation due to inactivity.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am having poor luck finding how a driver tells the stack
>>>>> it has beacon miss offload or not, so, does anyone know how
>>>>> this is controlled?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I still am not sure why stock firmware works, but it appears
>>>> the reason mine is failing is that the ACK status for mgt frames
>>>> is always set to TRUE since the ath10k wmi-mgt-tx API is so
>>>> lame. So, mac80211 does a probe, ath10k lies and says it was
>>>> acked, and mac80211 then things all is well for another few
>>>> seconds.
>>>
>>>
>>> mac80211 shouldn't do a Probe Req to an AP on beacon loss because
>>> ath10k advertises it supports tx-status report. Hence mac80211 should
>>> use NullFunc frames which shouldn't go through wmi-mgmt-tx but htt
>>> tx-frm.
>>>
>>> But then again: NullFunc status reporting via htt tx-frm was broken on
>>> 10.1 if memory serves right. I believe it was fixed in 10.2 or 10.2.4.
>>>
>>> This problem has been effectively obscured on stock 10.1 by the
>>> offloaded beacon miss.
>>
>>
>> For what it's worth, I looked at the 4.0.4 ath10k yesterday, and it appears
>> it
>> ignores the message that the 10.1 firmware sends when beacon loss happens
>> anyway. Maybe I misread the firmware code..it's a pile of indirection.
>>
>> Do you know how the firmware is supposed to signal beacon loss to
>> the host (from the host's perspective).
>
> Normally driver would advertise IEEE80211_HW_CONNECTION_MONITOR
> to disable mac80211 from tracking connection. and driver should call
> ieee80211_beacon_loss up on receiving beacon loss event from FW
> which triggers disconnection in mac80211.
I do not see any calls to beacon_loss() in the ath10k driver,
so probably that firmware feature is not just fully wired up
to the driver. Just as well since that firmware feature is
disabled in my (-diet variant) firmware entirely.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 21:07 Question on beacon-miss offloading Ben Greear
2015-06-11 23:38 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 6:03 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-12 13:29 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 14:10 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2015-06-12 15:22 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-06-12 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 5:36 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-15 15:35 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 19:45 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 5:29 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-16 21:55 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 23:06 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557AF925.4000609@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).