From: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com>
To: Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: spectral - simplify max_index calculation
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:11:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5582DFB2.7060308@neratec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFtRNNy009MVbOpHOWVZMuDAaJzmLed+nhBwgybgSS+hbjU=tQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/18/2015 04:13 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> [...]
> I have NDA documents as well stating that the indices are from -64 to
> 63 (-64 to -1, 1 to 63 and 0 is DC), you can check out for yourself
> that we get 128bins on dynamic HT20/40, see the header files too:
>
> #define SPECTRAL_HT20_40_NUM_BINS 128
>
Right, there are 128 in total, combined from 2 individual 64-bin sets. That's why
you need to swap upper and lower when operating in HT40MINUS, since chip always
puts primary channel to lower bin set.
> and/or the received packet length. Maybe you are talking about
> "static" HT40 (I don't see anything about that on the documents I
> have) or something else.
>
Yes, maybe different documents. Mine says that interpretation of upper/lower bin
values (max_magnitude, bitmap_weight, max_index) is the same in static and dynamic
modes - only the bin values differ.
>> I used the proposed method with the chirp detector for FFTs provided for long
>> radar pulses on an AR9590 (patch posted the same day). Max bin index is used there
>> the same way as with spectral, but now I realize my mistake: for chirp detection,
>> the relative max_index is sufficient, while for spectral the absolute value is needed.
>>
>> Toggling the MSB in HT20 shifts the signed values by 32 and leaves the index with
>> an offset of 4, therefore the correct operation should be:
>> ht20_max_index_absolute = (ht20_max_index ^ 0x20) - 4
>>
>
> Have in mind that on earlier chips (I did the testing on an AR9820) we
> get corrupted frames sometimes so we also need the sanity check I put
> there or else we can end up reading data out of bounds which is pretty
> dangerous so please leave the current implementation there as is.
>
>
The sanity checks / fixes are done before you look at the bin attributes and,
which therefore is not relevant for interpreting them.
But never mind - as said before, I proposed this to use the 3 functions for DFS
chirp detection. I'm fine not touching the running system and instead keep a local
copy of those.
Thanks,
Zefir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-18 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 9:21 [PATCH] ath9k: spectral - simplify max_index calculation Zefir Kurtisi
2015-06-18 8:43 ` Nick Kossifidis
2015-06-18 10:36 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2015-06-18 14:13 ` Nick Kossifidis
2015-06-18 15:11 ` Zefir Kurtisi [this message]
2015-06-18 15:59 ` Nick Kossifidis
2015-06-18 15:34 ` Nick Kossifidis
2015-06-18 15:46 ` Nick Kossifidis
2015-06-18 16:40 ` Zefir Kurtisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5582DFB2.7060308@neratec.com \
--to=zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).