linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel von Czettritz <michel.von.czettritz@gmail.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Cc: gregkh@linux.com, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: rtl8723au: fix "incorrect type in assignment"
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 01:36:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5594797A.3010609@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wrfj7fqj62mh.fsf@redhat.com>

On 07/01/2015 10:31 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Michel von Czettritz <michel.von.czettritz@gmail.com> writes:
>> Writing the output of cpu_to_le32 to an u32 or *(u32*) is an implicit
>> cast and results in an sparse warning.
>>
>> Since param and mask won't be changed, the implicit cast can be avoided
>> by creating local variables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michel von Czettritz <michel.von.czettritz@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c | 10 ++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>> index 1003365..a5e6726 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>> @@ -115,9 +115,10 @@ exit:
>>  
>>  int rtl8723a_set_rssi_cmd(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u32 *param)
>>  {
>> -	*((u32 *)param) = cpu_to_le32(*(param));
>> +	__le32 param_le;
>> +	param_le = cpu_to_le32(*(param));
>>  
>> -	FillH2CCmd(padapter, RSSI_SETTING_EID, 3, (u8 *)param);
>> +	FillH2CCmd(padapter, RSSI_SETTING_EID, 3, (u8 *)&param_le);
>>  
>>  	return _SUCCESS;
>>  }
>> @@ -125,10 +126,11 @@ int rtl8723a_set_rssi_cmd(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u32 *param)
>>  int rtl8723a_set_raid_cmd(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u32 mask, u8 arg)
>>  {
>>  	u8 buf[5];
>> +	__le32 mask_le;
>>  
>>  	memset(buf, 0, 5);
>> -	mask = cpu_to_le32(mask);
>> -	memcpy(buf, &mask, 4);
>> +	mask_le = cpu_to_le32(mask);
>> +	memcpy(buf, &mask_le, 4);
> 
> cpu_to_le32() + memcpy() is ugly - put_unaligned_le32() would make more
> sense.
> 
> Jes
I'm not sure if the fold, changing u32* to u32, and changing this, is a bit much.
Should this be a second patch? Or maybe a patch for each function?

Regards Michel


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-01 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-30 21:52 [PATCH 0/3] staging: rtl8723au: fix/clean up two functions Michel von Czettritz
2015-06-30 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: rtl8723au: adjust function param, u8* to u32* Michel von Czettritz
2015-06-30 21:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: rtl8723au: fix "incorrect type in assignment" Michel von Czettritz
2015-07-01  7:06   ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-01  7:56   ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-01 20:34     ` Jes Sorensen
2015-07-01 20:31   ` Jes Sorensen
2015-07-01 23:36     ` Michel von Czettritz [this message]
2015-07-02  2:00       ` Jes Sorensen
2015-06-30 21:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: rtl8723au: function no longer discards return value Michel von Czettritz
2015-07-01  7:12   ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-01  7:50     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-01  8:08       ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-01 16:50         ` Michel von Czettritz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5594797A.3010609@gmail.com \
    --to=michel.von.czettritz@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).