From: periyasa@codeaurora.org
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath10k: send (re)assoc peer command when NSS changed"
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:11:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559965cc9735f6616957f9ee84a17e52@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=xxG_Jp=uC-Cx96R0YzO8O0tOVe2G6Nyx8ceWopiwvXQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2018-02-26 14:15, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hi!
>
> On 25 February 2018 at 22:16, Karthikeyan Periyasamy
> <periyasa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> This reverts commit 55884c045d31a29cf69db8332d1064a1b61dd159.
>>
>> When Ath10k is in AP mode and an unassociated STA sends a VHT action
>> frame
>> (Operating Mode Notification for the NSS change) periodically to AP
>> this causes
>> ath10k to call ath10k_station_assoc() which sends WMI_PEER_ASSOC_CMDID
>> during
>> NSS update. Over the time (with a certain client it can happen within
>> 15 mins
>> when there are over 500 of these VHT action frames) continuous calls
>> of
>> WMI_PEER_ASSOC_CMDID cause firmware to assert due to resource exhaust.
>>
>> To my knowledge setting WMI_PEER_NSS peer param itself enough to
>> handle NSS
>> updates and no need to call ath10k_station_assoc(). So revert the
>> original
>> commit from 2014 as it's unclear why the change was really needed.
>> Now the firmware assert doesn't happen anymore.
>>
>> Issue observed in QCA9984 platform with firmware
>> version:10.4-3.5.3-00053.
>> This Change tested in QCA9984 with firmware version: 10.4-3.5.3-00053
>> and
>> QCA988x platform with firmware version: 10.2.4-1.0-00036.
>
> Did you test this on any of the other major firmware variants? I
> wonder if it snuck in because of some firmware quirk in something way
> before dakota/cascade and 10.4 were a thing.
>
> Eg, Peregrine? Rome? Maybe even earlier Beeliner, just to double check?
>
Yes. I tested this on peregrine, Beeliner, Dakota and Cascade. This code
was introduced before Rome.
Thanks,
Karthikeyan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-26 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 6:16 [PATCH] Revert "ath10k: send (re)assoc peer command when NSS changed" Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2018-02-26 8:45 ` Adrian Chadd
2018-02-26 10:41 ` periyasa [this message]
2018-02-26 15:56 ` Ben Greear
2018-02-26 17:06 ` periyasa
2018-02-26 19:21 ` Adrian Chadd
2018-02-27 4:00 ` periyasa
2018-02-26 19:17 ` Peter Oh
2018-02-27 8:49 ` fixed bit rate 9Mbps set as 24Mbps in g mode(legacy) KAVITA MATHUR
2018-02-27 16:41 ` Ben Greear
[not found] ` <20180228035700.M28643@cdot.in>
2018-02-28 19:43 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559965cc9735f6616957f9ee84a17e52@codeaurora.org \
--to=periyasa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adrian.chadd@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).