From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f193.google.com ([209.85.217.193]:35078 "EHLO mail-lb0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753534AbbJHS3m (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:29:42 -0400 Message-ID: <5616B60F.7040804@gmail.com> (sfid-20151008_203001_723447_3644856F) Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 21:29:35 +0300 From: Stanislav Kholmanskikh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: johnny.kim@atmel.com, rachel.kim@atmel.com, chris.park@atmel.com, tony.cho@atmel.com, glen.lee@atmel.com, leo.kim@atmel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: staging: wilc1000: WILC1000_DYNAMICALLY_ALLOCATE_MEMROY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi! I noticed that drivers/staging/wilc1000/Kconfic defines: config WILC1000_DYNAMICALLY_ALLOCATE_MEMROY bool "Dynamically allocate memory in real time" ---help--- This choice supports dynamic allocation of the memory for the receive buffer. The driver will allocate the RX buffer when it is required. "MEMROY" looks suspicious. Is it a typo (MEMORY?) or by intent? Thanks!