* FCC DFS support @ 2015-10-16 16:53 Tim Harvey 2015-10-19 9:10 ` Zefir Kurtisi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Tim Harvey @ 2015-10-16 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless Greetings, Is FCC DFS support (from the updated rules released in Aug 2014) fully supported in ath10k by the driver/firmware/cards? The linux-wireless DFS page [1] has some great info but doesn't really list what is currently in place and working and doesn't mention ath10k specifically and I didn't see anything on the ath10k page either [2]. Thanks for any info! Regards, Tim [1] - https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/dfs [2] - https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: FCC DFS support 2015-10-16 16:53 FCC DFS support Tim Harvey @ 2015-10-19 9:10 ` Zefir Kurtisi 2015-10-19 13:31 ` Tim Harvey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Zefir Kurtisi @ 2015-10-19 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Harvey, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless On 10/16/2015 06:53 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > Greetings, > > Is FCC DFS support (from the updated rules released in Aug 2014) fully > supported in ath10k by the driver/firmware/cards? > > The linux-wireless DFS page [1] has some great info but doesn't really > list what is currently in place and working and doesn't mention ath10k > specifically and I didn't see anything on the ath10k page either [2]. > > Thanks for any info! > > Regards, > > Tim > > [1] - https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/dfs > [2] - https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k > -- > Hi Tim, you're right, unfortunately the DFS documentation in [1] is quite outdated - basically in its initial state from 2011 when ath10k was unknown. It took around four years to get the work done, and since numerous parties contributed at different times and different modules (driver, mac/cfg, hostapd), the documentation has not always been updated accordingly. But the more important fact is: yes, ath10 and ath9k today fully support FCC. We certified one of our ath9k based products for FCC and ETSI some months ago, and I got confirmations that ath10k also passed certification testing for FCC. It is relevant to note that both drivers use the same radar pattern detector (and all upper layers anyway), so that if ath9k passed, ath10k most probably will also do (and vice versa). Hth, Zefir ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: FCC DFS support 2015-10-19 9:10 ` Zefir Kurtisi @ 2015-10-19 13:31 ` Tim Harvey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Tim Harvey @ 2015-10-19 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zefir Kurtisi; +Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> wrote: > On 10/16/2015 06:53 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> Is FCC DFS support (from the updated rules released in Aug 2014) fully >> supported in ath10k by the driver/firmware/cards? >> >> The linux-wireless DFS page [1] has some great info but doesn't really >> list what is currently in place and working and doesn't mention ath10k >> specifically and I didn't see anything on the ath10k page either [2]. >> >> Thanks for any info! >> >> Regards, >> >> Tim >> >> [1] - https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/dfs >> [2] - https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k >> -- >> > > Hi Tim, > > you're right, unfortunately the DFS documentation in [1] is quite outdated - > basically in its initial state from 2011 when ath10k was unknown. It took around > four years to get the work done, and since numerous parties contributed at > different times and different modules (driver, mac/cfg, hostapd), the > documentation has not always been updated accordingly. > > But the more important fact is: yes, ath10 and ath9k today fully support FCC. > > We certified one of our ath9k based products for FCC and ETSI some months ago, and > I got confirmations that ath10k also passed certification testing for FCC. > > It is relevant to note that both drivers use the same radar pattern detector (and > all upper layers anyway), so that if ath9k passed, ath10k most probably will also > do (and vice versa). > > > Hth, > Zefir > > Zefir, Thank you for the information! Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-19 13:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-10-16 16:53 FCC DFS support Tim Harvey 2015-10-19 9:10 ` Zefir Kurtisi 2015-10-19 13:31 ` Tim Harvey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).