linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: glen lee <glen.lee@atmel.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Punit Vara <punitvara@gmail.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	<chris.park@atmel.com>, <austin.shin@atmel.com>,
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <johnny.kim@atmel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tony.cho@atmel.com>,
	<leo.kim@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Staging: wilc1000: Fix build break due to undeclared *wilc and implicit declaration of init_irq
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:02:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56405328.4040004@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563FFEEB.1090307@atmel.com>

Hi Punit Vara,

I cannot find build errors on my build machines.

According the log which you have posted before says *wilc is undeclared in the function init_wilc_driver,
which means WILC_SPI is selected because one of SPI or SDIO should be chosen at the moment.
Hence, struct wilc *wilc should be compiled together.
It looks like wilc1000 is compiled without SPI or SDIO.

Of course, there are many cases that I don't know, so you could let me know the wilc1000 build configuration?

static int __init init_wilc_driver(void)
{
#ifdef WILC_SPI
	struct wilc *wilc;
#endif

..

#ifdef WILC_SDIO
	{
		int ret;

		ret = sdio_register_driver(&wilc_bus);
		if (ret < 0)
			PRINT_D(INIT_DBG, "init_wilc_driver: Failed register sdio driver\n");

		return ret;
	}
#else
	PRINT_D(INIT_DBG, "Initializing netdev\n");
	if (wilc_netdev_init(&wilc))
		PRINT_ER("Couldn't initialize netdev\n");
	return 0;
#endif

regards,
glen lee.


On 2015년 11월 09일 11:03, glen lee wrote:
> I just check the email, I will get back here after I check the patches 
> related with this issue.
>
> regards,
> glen lee.
>
>
> On 2015년 11월 09일 06:59, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Top posting beucase I am a bad person. Punit, you should have CC'd Glen
>> since this is his code.
>>
>> The fix is still not right.  It will cause an unused variable warning on
>> some configs.
>>
>> To be honest, this code makes no sense.  Why do we even have the wilc
>> variable in this function when we never use it?  Just declare move it to
>> wilc_netdev_init().  Also there are too many ifdefs in this code.
>>
>> regards,
>> dan carpenter
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:01:50AM +0530, Punit Vara wrote:
>>> This patch is to the linux_wlan.c file that fixes up break found during
>>> make drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.o
>>>
>>> Patch add following things to file :
>>> -init_irq declaration
>>> -At preprocessor (!defined WILC_SDIO) to defination of init_irq
>>> -At preprocessor (!defined WILC_SDIO) to defination isr_uh_routine
>>> -removes unnecessary lines to declare *wilc
>>>
>>> Patch fixes 702c0e50f and 2c1d05d10 tags.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <punitvara@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> -Fixes tag added suggested by Dan carpenter.
>>> -Remove declaration of autovariable with same type and same name 
>>> suggested by Joe Perches
>>>
>>>   drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c | 10 ++++++----
>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c 
>>> b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
>>> index 086f1db..5bd14ed 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
>>> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int dev_state_ev_handler(struct 
>>> notifier_block *this, unsigned long event
>>>       return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>   }
>>>   -#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO)
>>> +#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO) || (!defined 
>>> WILC_SDIO)
>>>   static irqreturn_t isr_uh_routine(int irq, void *user_data)
>>>   {
>>>       perInterface_wlan_t *nic;
>>> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ irqreturn_t isr_bh_routine(int irq, void *userdata)
>>>       return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>>   }
>>>   -#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO)
>>> +#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO) || (!defined 
>>> WILC_SDIO)
>>>   static int init_irq(struct net_device *dev)
>>>   {
>>>       int ret = 0;
>>> @@ -937,6 +937,10 @@ static void wlan_deinitialize_threads(struct 
>>> net_device *dev)
>>>       }
>>>   }
>>>   +#if (!defined WILC_SDIO) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO)
>>> +static int init_irq(struct net_device *dev);
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>>   int wilc1000_wlan_init(struct net_device *dev, perInterface_wlan_t 
>>> *p_nic)
>>>   {
>>>       wilc_wlan_inp_t nwi;
>>> @@ -1578,9 +1582,7 @@ int wilc_netdev_init(struct wilc **wilc)
>>>     static int __init init_wilc_driver(void)
>>>   {
>>> -#ifdef WILC_SPI
>>>       struct wilc *wilc;
>>> -#endif
>>>     #if defined(WILC_DEBUGFS)
>>>       if (wilc_debugfs_init() < 0) {
>>> -- 
>>> 2.6.2
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel@linuxdriverproject.org
>>> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel 
>>>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-09  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-08 21:31 [PATCH V2] Staging: wilc1000: Fix build break due to undeclared *wilc and implicit declaration of init_irq Punit Vara
2015-11-08 21:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-09  2:03   ` glen lee
2015-11-09  8:02     ` glen lee [this message]
2015-11-09  8:18       ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-09  8:51         ` punit vara
2015-11-09  8:55         ` glen lee
2015-11-09  9:05           ` punit vara
2015-11-09 10:01             ` glen lee
2015-11-09 10:13               ` punit vara
2015-11-09 10:23                 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-11-09 14:39                   ` punit vara
2015-11-13 14:18                     ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-12-02  3:09                   ` punit vara
2015-12-02  7:00                     ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-12-02  7:31                       ` punit vara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56405328.4040004@atmel.com \
    --to=glen.lee@atmel.com \
    --cc=austin.shin@atmel.com \
    --cc=chris.park@atmel.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johnny.kim@atmel.com \
    --cc=leo.kim@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=punitvara@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony.cho@atmel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).